Is the Malegaon Blast Case Verdict a 'Slap' on Congress?
Click to start listening
Synopsis
Madhya Pradesh Minister Kailash Vijayvargiya's fiery remarks on the Malegaon blast case verdict highlight the ongoing political tensions surrounding the case. The court's acquittal of the accused is seen as a significant setback for Congress, leading to accusations of political manipulation. This incident continues to spark debates on justice and political accountability.
Key Takeaways
- Indore Minister criticizes Congress for the Malegaon verdict.
- Acquittal of seven accused signals a pivotal moment.
- Charges dropped due to insufficient evidence.
- Political narratives surrounding the case remain contentious.
- Compensation ordered for victims' families.
Indore, Aug 3 (NationPress) Madhya Pradesh Minister Kailash Vijayvargiya vehemently criticized the Congress party following the recent acquittal of all seven defendants in the 2008 Malegaon blast case. He described the court's ruling as a “slap in the face” of Congress, which he accused of attempting to falsely implicate innocent individuals to advance a narrative of “Hindu terror”.
Addressing the gathering at the Chhadi Nishan Poojan ceremony of Goga Dev, coinciding with Goga Navami at Hansdas Math in Indore, Vijayvargiya stated, “These innocent individuals were victimized for years through fabricated cases, and today’s ruling serves as a slap to prominent Congress figures like Sonia Gandhi and P. Chidambaram.”
A special National Investigation Agency (NIA) court on July 31 acquitted all seven individuals implicated in the Malegaon blast case, including former BJP MP Sadhvi Pragya Singh Thakur and Lt Colonel Prasad Shrikant Purohit.
The court dismissed all charges under the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act (UAPA), Arms Act, and the Indian Penal Code (IPC), citing insufficient evidence to substantiate the prosecution's claims.
Accusing Congress of mistreating the accused, Vijayvargiya remarked, “They treated Sadhvi Pragya Singh cruelly, leading to her ongoing back pain. Congress subjected innocent people to torment, branding it 'Bhagwa atankwad (saffron terror)'. They were coerced into naming members of the Sangh (Rashtra Swayamsevak Sangh), yet they stood firm.”
He further emphasized, “This verdict is a significant blow to Congress leaders.”
Vijayvargiya insisted that “no amount of condemnation could suffice” for the years of alleged mistreatment inflicted by Congress on the accused, reaffirming his belief that they were wrongfully charged.
The blast occurred on September 29, 2008, near Bhikku Chowk mosque in Malegaon city, Nashik district of Maharashtra. A bomb affixed to a motorcycle detonated during the holy month of Ramzan, just days ahead of the Hindu festival of Navratri.
The explosion resulted in six fatalities and over 100 injuries in the communally sensitive region.
After nearly 17 years of legal proceedings, the verdict was announced in a crowded courtroom with all accused present, as mandated by the court.
Along with the acquittal, the court mandated compensation of Rs 2 lakh to the families of each deceased victim and Rs 50,000 for every injured individual.
Point of View
It's crucial to acknowledge the complex interplay between legal decisions and political narratives. The acquittal in the Malegaon blast case raises important questions about justice and accountability, serving as a reminder of the ongoing struggles within our political landscape. While Minister Vijayvargiya's comments reflect a significant sentiment, it is imperative to view this development from multiple perspectives to ensure a balanced discourse.
NationPress
05/09/2025
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the Malegaon blast case?
The Malegaon blast case refers to the bomb explosion that occurred on September 29, 2008, in Malegaon city, resulting in six deaths and over 100 injuries.
Who were acquitted in the Malegaon blast case?
Seven individuals, including former BJP MP Sadhvi Pragya Singh Thakur and Lt Colonel Prasad Shrikant Purohit, were acquitted by the NIA court.
What were the charges dropped by the court?
The court dismissed charges under the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act (UAPA), Arms Act, and the Indian Penal Code (IPC) due to lack of evidence.
What did Kailash Vijayvargiya say about the verdict?
Vijayvargiya described the verdict as a “slap on the face” of Congress, accusing them of falsely implicating innocent individuals.
What compensation was ordered by the court?
The court ordered compensation of Rs 2 lakh for the families of each deceased victim and Rs 50,000 for each injured victim.
