Should the Kerala HC Stay the ED Action on the Masala Bond Case?
Synopsis
Key Takeaways
- KIIFB is challenging the ED's notice in court.
- Funds raised were claimed to be for state development projects.
- The ED alleges improper use of Masala Bond funds.
- The outcome could impact Kerala's infrastructure funding model.
- Legal proceedings are set for December 16.
Kochi, December 11 (NationPress) The Kochi Infrastructure Investment Fund Board (KIIFB) has formally approached the High Court, aiming to annul the Enforcement Directorate’s adjudication notice linked to purported breaches in its 2019 Masala Bond transaction.
After initial arguments were presented, the court scheduled the case for Tuesday to deliberate on the request for an interim stay.
In its application, KIIFB has requested the court to halt all actions stemming from the ED notice until a conclusive verdict is reached.
The ED's concerns arise from its assertion that KIIFB misappropriated Masala Bond funds for real estate acquisitions—a claim that the state funding agency vehemently contests.
KIIFB maintained that the funds generated through the Masala Bond were exclusively allocated for state development projects, which included land acquisition for infrastructure endeavors.
It clarified that this process does not equate to partaking in real estate activities, as alleged by the ED.
However, the agency argues that proceeds from Masala Bonds can solely be utilized for projects situated on land already owned by the government or acquired through non-Masala Bond means.
Per submissions from the Additional Solicitor General, employing the bond proceeds for land purchases—even for governmental initiatives—contravenes the usage stipulations linked to such internationally sourced funds.
The ED claims that KIIFB utilized Rs 467 crore out of the Rs 2,672 crore raised to procure land, thereby violating FEMA regulations.
Notices were also dispatched to Chief Minister Pinarayi Vijayan, former Finance Minister Thomas Isaac, and several senior officials involved in the bond mobilization process.
The ED's adjudication process follows its earlier report indicating that foreign fundraising for the KIIFB Masala Bond breached procedural norms under FEMA.
The controversy surrounding the KIIFB Masala Bond has resurfaced at a politically charged time, with the state government labeling the ED’s findings as “misguided and misplaced,” while asserting that all transactions were transparent, audited, and compliant with globally recognized infrastructure financing standards.
With the High Court set to review the plea for interim relief on Tuesday (December 16), the outcome of this case is likely to have significant ramifications for the state’s flagship infrastructure funding model.