NDA hits back at Rahul Gandhi over UPI charges, dismisses 'US pressure' claim
Synopsis
Key Takeaways
New Delhi, 16 September 2026 — National Democratic Alliance (NDA) leaders on Wednesday mounted a coordinated defence of the government's revised UPI transaction fee framework, rejecting Lok Sabha Leader of Opposition Rahul Gandhi's allegation that the change was made under pressure from the United States and calling his claims baseless.
What the NDA Leaders Said
Union Minister Ramdas Athawale said the decision — which introduces a 0.4% Merchant Discount Rate (MDR) on select UPI transactions above ₹2,000 — was fair and would not burden small vendors. 'For transactions up to ₹2,000, small vendors and businesses face no issues. However, if their business transactions exceed ₹2,000, charging a nominal 0.4 per cent fee is not a huge burden. For instance, on transactions up to ₹75,000, they only have to pay around ₹300,' Athawale said.
Athawale directly dismissed Gandhi's 'US pressure' allegation. 'Rahul Gandhi's allegation that this step was taken under US pressure is completely baseless. America has nothing to do with this decision,' he said.
BJP MP Gulam Ali Khatana accused the Indian National Congress (INC) of attempting to manufacture fear. 'Congress should look within itself and see what it did during its time. There is no burden on the poor regarding UPI charges. However, when you use a facility and make bulk transactions, institutions should receive some consideration,' Khatana said.
BJP Spokesperson Invokes Congress History
BJP National Spokesperson Guru Prakash went further, accusing Gandhi of harbouring what he termed a 'Trump phobia' and drawing a historical parallel with former Prime Minister Indira Gandhi. 'Rahul Gandhi ji has developed a Trump phobia, an America phobia. Every decision that is made is under pressure from America. Indira Gandhi ji used to say, 'America's hand is involved', and she even called Jayaprakash Narayan ji a CIA agent,' Guru Prakash said.
He also invoked a statement attributed to veteran Congress leader P. Chidambaram, arguing the party had previously questioned the practicality of digital payments for small vendors. 'Chidambaram ji used to say, 'If UPI payments come and payments are made through technology, how will a vegetable vendor manage?' Today, the world's most robust, transparent and better UPI interface is in India,' Guru Prakash added.
JD(U) and Finance Ministry Back the Move
Janata Dal (United) National Spokesperson Rajiv Ranjan sought to reassure ordinary users. 'Ordinary consumers do not need to worry too much. Generally speaking, we can say that this is a very minor increase, and even that cost will have to be borne by the merchants,' he said.
Separately, the Finance Ministry posted on social media platform X that India's digital payment decisions are made independently and debunked claims linking the MDR revision to foreign influence. 'Since its launch in 2016, UPI has grown into the world's largest real-time interoperable payment system — entirely on India's own terms,' the ministry stated.
What Rahul Gandhi Alleged
The row erupted after Gandhi on Tuesday posted on X: 'The Modi government has quietly opened the door to imposing fees on UPI.' He alleged that American payment companies had 'long opposed India's zero-MDR policy' and that the government had 'opened the path to changing the policy in exactly that direction.'
The trigger was a National Payments Corporation of India (NPCI) announcement on Tuesday revising the MDR framework for select UPI transactions. Under the revised structure, charges apply to certain merchant payments above ₹2,000, while small merchants and low-value transactions continue to enjoy zero MDR.
What Happens Next
The political battle over UPI's fee structure is likely to intensify in Parliament, with the opposition expected to press the government for clarity on the NPCI's rationale and implementation timeline. Whether the revised MDR affects consumer behaviour on India's dominant payments rail — which processed over 100 billion transactions since its 2016 launch — remains the central question ahead.