Did NHRC Take Suo Moto Action on Alleged Assault of Journalists by MP Police?
Click to start listening
Synopsis
The NHRC's action underscores the urgent need for protecting journalists' rights amidst rising threats. This case highlights the intersection of law enforcement and media freedom, raising critical questions about accountability.
Key Takeaways
- NHRC's involvement signifies a serious response to human rights violations.
- Journalist safety is a pressing issue in India.
- The case highlights potential collusion between local authorities and illegal activities.
- Judicial scrutiny of police actions is crucial for accountability.
- Media freedom is essential for a healthy democracy.
New Delhi, June 5 (NationPress) The National Human Rights Commission (NHRC) has initiated suo motu cognizance regarding the violent assault on two journalists by the Madhya Pradesh police due to their coverage of "illegal sand mining" occurring in the Chambal river.
The foremost human rights organization has dispatched a notice to the Director General of Police (DGP) of Madhya Pradesh, demanding a comprehensive report on this issue within a fortnight.
In light of a press statement from the Press Club of India, the NHRC expressed that the allegations contained in the press release, if verified, indicate a significant breach of the human rights of the affected journalists.
The Supreme Court is currently reviewing a petition submitted by journalists Shashikant Jatav and Amarkant Singh Chouhan, who report facing severe threats to their safety and freedom from the Bhind police.
On Wednesday, a panel of Justices Sanjay Karol and Satish Chandra Sharma acknowledged their request but refrained from issuing any interim protective measures against potential coercive actions.
Judge Karol noted that before any interim ruling could be made, the Madhya Pradesh government must also present its version of the facts.
"If you commit a crime such as murder, can we really provide you with an order against coercive actions? We are unaware of what crime has been reported against you," remarked the Supreme Court, urging the petitioners’ counsel to include the Superintendent of Police of Bhind as a respondent.
The court is scheduled to hear their case next on Monday (June 9).
The journalists asserted that they were compelled to leave their hometown due to the severity of these threats following their revelations about "illegal" sand mining in the Chambal river, allegedly conducted with local police backing.
Within their writ petition submitted to the apex court, the journalists identified IPS officer Asit Yadav and his associates as central figures in the abuse, claiming that the targeting is in retaliation for their investigative reporting.
They have alleged custodial assault, caste-based discrimination, kidnapping, and ongoing harassment from the Bhind police.
Point of View
It is imperative that we stand firmly with the nation in advocating for the rights of journalists. Their safety is paramount in ensuring a free and independent press, which is essential for democracy. The NHRC's involvement in this matter reflects the importance of accountability in law enforcement.
NationPress
08/06/2025
Frequently Asked Questions
What prompted the NHRC's action?
The NHRC acted following reports of police brutality against two journalists who reported on illegal sand mining in the Chambal river.
What are the journalists alleging?
The journalists allege custodial assault, caste-based abuse, and ongoing harassment from the Bhind police.
What is the Supreme Court's role in this case?
The Supreme Court is reviewing the journalists' petition and has issued notices regarding their claims but has not yet provided protective measures.
