NHRC issues fresh notice to Meta over CSAM on Instagram, Facebook

Share:
Audio Loading voice…
NHRC issues fresh notice to Meta over CSAM on Instagram, Facebook

Synopsis

Two national commissions — the NHRC and NCPCR — are now simultaneously pursuing Meta over alleged CSAM on Instagram and Facebook. With an FIR being registered in Delhi, five state police forces under orders, and MeitY directed to block URLs, this is the most coordinated regulatory action against a global social media platform on child safety in India's history.

Key Takeaways

The NHRC issued a fresh notice on 3 August to Meta , MeitY , and police forces of West Bengal , Chandigarh , Haryana , Odisha , and New Delhi over alleged CSAM on Instagram and Facebook .
An earlier NHRC notice dated 8 July was triggered by BBC World Service reports of paid Instagram ads promoting CSAM and redirecting users to Telegram .
Delhi Commissioner of Police Anurag Kumar is reportedly pursuing an FIR against Meta Platforms under the POCSO Act, 2012 .
The NHRC issued a compliance warning on 29 July , threatening coercive powers after Delhi Police missed its 15-day deadline.
The NCPCR has separately launched a formal inquiry following Meta's reply to a 3 July notice.
The NHRC has framed CSAM circulation as a continuing violation of a child's dignity, privacy, and human rights.

The National Human Rights Commission (NHRC) has sharply escalated its scrutiny of Meta Platforms over the alleged circulation of Child Sexual Abuse Material (CSAM) on Instagram and Facebook, issuing a second formal notice on 3 August while a parallel probe — triggered by BBC reports — continues to advance. The Commission is now pursuing two concurrent proceedings against the social media giant, with multiple state police forces, the Ministry of Electronics and Information Technology (MeitY), and Meta's own law enforcement desk all under directions to act.

What the August 3 Notice Demands

The latest notice followed a complaint from a non-profit foundation that received an anonymous tip-off about pornographic and age-inappropriate links on Instagram and Facebook potentially containing CSAM. The foundation submitted a list of URLs strictly for investigative purposes, clarifying that it had neither accessed, downloaded, viewed, nor stored the content — in compliance with the POCSO Act, 2012, and the IT Act, 2000.

The NHRC has directed the Secretary of MeitY, the Directors General of Police of West Bengal, Chandigarh, Haryana, Odisha, and New Delhi, and Meta's Head of Law Enforcement (India) to submit detailed Action Taken Reports within one week. State police forces have been instructed to examine the flagged URLs through their cyber crime or special juvenile police units, register FIRs where cognisable offences are established, identify and prosecute those responsible, and immediately rescue any identified child victims for production before the Child Welfare Committee.

MeitY must report on the blocking of the URLs, action taken against the intermediary, and long-term child safety measures. Meta has been directed to remove the content, preserve metadata and IP logs, comply with reporting obligations under Section 19 of the POCSO Act, and detail its preventive mechanisms.

The Earlier BBC-Triggered Probe

The August notice builds on a prior intervention. On 8 July, the NHRC took cognisance of BBC World Service reports alleging that paid advertisements on Instagram promoted CSAM in India using search terms such as 'rape video' and 'child video', redirecting users to Telegram channels where the material was allegedly offered for sale. According to those reports, the advertisements had passed through Meta's own review mechanism and remained live even after being flagged through the platform's grievance system — until the BBC directly brought them to Meta's attention.

The NHRC Bench, presided over by member Priyank Kanoongo, is conducting these proceedings under Section 12 of the Protection of Human Rights Act, 1993. The July notice directed Delhi Commissioner of Police Anurag Kumar to conduct a comprehensive investigation, preserve electronic evidence including advertisement records, metadata and financial trails, identify advertisers, perpetrators, and child victims, and examine whether Meta had complied with mandatory reporting obligations under Sections 19 and 20 of the POCSO Act. The Commission also noted potential liability under Section 23(3) of the Act.

Delhi Police FIR and Compliance Warning

Following the NHRC's directions from the July notice, Delhi Commissioner of Police Anurag Kumar has initiated a priority investigation and is reportedly ensuring the registration of an FIR against Meta Platforms for offences under the POCSO Act and other applicable laws.

However, the Commission had to issue a reminder on 29 July after Delhi Police failed to submit its Action Taken Report within the stipulated 15 days. The NHRC warned that non-compliance within a further seven days could trigger invocation of its coercive powers under Section 13 of the Protection of Human Rights Act, 1993. Notably, the Commission cited the Supreme Court's ruling in Just Rights for Children Alliance & Another Vs S Harish & Others, reiterating that intermediaries are legally obligated to report suspected POCSO offences to both the National Centre for Missing & Exploited Children (NCMEC) and the Special Juvenile Police Unit or local police.

NCPCR Launches Formal Inquiry

In a parallel development, the National Commission for Protection of Child Rights (NCPCR) has resolved to institute a formal inquiry into the allegations concerning child sexual exploitative and abuse material on Meta's platforms, according to government sources. The decision follows Meta's response to an NCPCR notice issued on 3 July, which itself arose from suo motu cognisance of the same BBC Eye investigation. Meta Platforms Inc. submitted its reply within a week of receiving the notice. After examining the response, the NCPCR has determined the matter warrants a full inquiry to establish the facts, including whether the platform complied with applicable child protection and intermediary obligations.

What the Commission Has Emphasised

Across both proceedings, the NHRC has stressed that every instance of creation or continued circulation of CSAM constitutes a continuing violation of a child's dignity, privacy, and human rights. The Commission has called for urgent action on victim rescue, rehabilitation, and prosecution of all those responsible. With two national commissions now actively pursuing Meta and multiple state police forces under directions, the regulatory pressure on the platform in India is at its most intense yet.

Point of View

Multi-agency enforcement. Yet the real test is speed: child victims cannot wait for bureaucratic timelines, and the NHRC's own reminder to Delhi Police for missing a 15-day deadline reveals how institutional sluggishness can blunt even urgent directives. Meta's structural failure here — paid advertisements promoting CSAM clearing its own review mechanism — is not a moderation gap but a monetisation failure, and regulators have so far stopped short of naming that distinction explicitly. Whether MeitY moves beyond URL-blocking to impose intermediary liability will determine if this becomes a landmark accountability moment or another well-documented case that fades without consequence.
NationPress
5 Aug 2026

Frequently Asked Questions

What action has the NHRC taken against Meta over CSAM?
The NHRC has issued two formal notices to Meta — on 8 July and 3 August — directing the removal of CSAM from Instagram and Facebook, preservation of metadata and IP logs, and compliance with POCSO Act reporting obligations. Five state police forces and MeitY have also been directed to act within one week.
What did the BBC reports allege about Instagram and CSAM?
BBC World Service reports alleged that paid advertisements on Instagram promoted CSAM in India using terms such as 'rape video' and 'child video', redirecting users to Telegram channels where the material was allegedly sold. The advertisements reportedly cleared Meta's own review process and remained live even after being flagged through the platform's grievance system.
Is an FIR being registered against Meta in India?
Yes, according to reports, Delhi Commissioner of Police Anurag Kumar has initiated a priority investigation and is reportedly ensuring the registration of an FIR against Meta Platforms for offences under the POCSO Act, 2012, and other applicable laws, following NHRC directions.
What is the NCPCR doing in this case?
The National Commission for Protection of Child Rights has resolved to conduct a formal inquiry into allegations of child sexual exploitative and abuse material on Meta's platforms. The decision follows Meta's reply to an NCPCR notice issued on 3 July, which arose from suo motu cognisance of the BBC Eye investigation.
What legal obligations does Meta have under Indian law regarding CSAM?
Under the POCSO Act, 2012, intermediaries are required to report suspected offences under Sections 19 and 20, and face potential liability under Section 23(3). The Supreme Court, in Just Rights for Children Alliance & Another Vs S Harish & Others, has also reiterated that platforms must report such material to NCMEC and the Special Juvenile Police Unit or local police.
Nation Press
The Trail

Connected Dots

Tracing the thread behind this story — newest first.

8 Dots
  1. Latest 5 days ago
  2. 1 week ago
  3. 3 weeks ago
  4. 1 month ago
  5. 1 month ago
  6. 1 month ago
  7. 1 month ago
  8. 1 year ago
Google Prefer NP
On Google