Did NIA file a chargesheet against 17 individuals in Chhattisgarh CRPF camps attack case?

Click to start listening
Did NIA file a chargesheet against 17 individuals in Chhattisgarh CRPF camps attack case?

Synopsis

The NIA has officially charged 17 individuals linked to the January 16 attacks on CRPF camps in Bijapur, Chhattisgarh. With 16 absconding suspects, this case uncovers a serious conspiracy against state security. Discover the details of this alarming situation and the implications for regional safety.

Key Takeaways

  • NIA has filed a chargesheet against 17 individuals.
  • 16 of the accused are currently absconding.
  • The chargesheet cites serious legal provisions.
  • Attack involved a significant number of armed insurgents.
  • Ongoing investigations highlight regional security threats.

Raipur, June 14 (NationPress) The National Investigation Agency (NIA) has filed a chargesheet against 17 individuals in relation to the attacks on Central Reserve Police Force (CRPF) camps that occurred on January 16, 2024 in Bijapur district, Chhattisgarh. Out of those named, 16 are currently fugitives, while one suspect, identified as Sodi Baman alias Deval, is in custody.

This chargesheet, presented to the NIA Special Court in Jagdalpur, cites numerous sections of the Indian Penal Code, Arms Act, Explosive Substances Act, and the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, according to a statement from the agency.

The individuals charged include two members of the Central Committee, two members from the Special Zonal or State Committee, and senior operatives from the People’s Liberation Guerrilla Army (PLGA) Battalion No. 01, Telangana State Committee, and Pamed Area Committee.

This case involves coordinated assaults on three CRPF facilities: the newly established Dharmavaram camp and adjacent camps at Chintawagu and Pamed.

The assailants, estimated to be between 250 to 300 armed members of the banned CPI (Maoist), utilized automatic weapons and barrel grenade launchers in their attempt to seize arms and supplies.

As a result of the attack on the Dharmavaram camp, which had only been operational for less than a month, twelve CRPF personnel sustained injuries.

The NIA assumed control of the investigation from local law enforcement on February 9, 2024. The agency asserts that the accused were involved in a broader conspiracy aimed at waging war against the Indian state.

They allegedly participated in recruiting young individuals, conducting surveillance on the targeted camps, and establishing a fake training facility to rehearse the attack.

The investigation also revealed that the accused delivered motivational speeches and provided combat training to their cadres in preparation for the offensive.

Findings from the NIA underscore the persistent threat posed by CPI (Maoist) elements in the region and emphasize the group's attempts to undermine security infrastructure through coordinated militant actions.

Further legal proceedings in this case are anticipated to continue in the Jagdalpur court.

Point of View

It is essential to highlight the grave situation that the NIA has brought to light regarding the January 16 attacks. The conspiracy to wage war against the Indian state reflects a disturbing trend in regional security. It is imperative that we remain vigilant and informed about such developments.
NationPress
14/06/2025

Frequently Asked Questions

What prompted the NIA to take over the investigation?
The NIA took over the investigation from local police on February 9, 2024, due to the serious nature of the attacks and the broader conspiracy involved.
How many individuals were charged in the case?
A total of 17 individuals have been charged, with 16 currently absconding.
What actions did the attackers take during the assault?
The attackers used automatic weapons and grenade launchers to attempt to loot arms and supplies from the CRPF camps.
What are the legal provisions invoked in the chargesheet?
The chargesheet invokes multiple provisions of the Indian Penal Code, Arms Act, Explosive Substances Act, and the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act.
What does this case indicate about the CPI (Maoist)?
The case underscores the continued threat posed by CPI (Maoist) operatives and their efforts to destabilize security in the region.