Did Op Sindoor Shock Congress? Nishikant Dubey Weighs In

Click to start listening
Did Op Sindoor Shock Congress? Nishikant Dubey Weighs In

Synopsis

BJP MP Nishikant Dubey takes a strong stance against Congress regarding its inconsistent views on Operation Sindoor. He highlights the operational success and criticizes Congress for questioning the Army while trusting adversaries. This article delves into the political implications and the reactions from both sides.

Key Takeaways

  • Nishikant Dubey criticizes Congress for its flip-flop on Operation Sindoor.
  • The operation left both enemies and Congress astonished.
  • Dubey emphasizes the power of indigenous defense technology.
  • Congress is accused of undermining the Army for political gain.
  • The importance of respecting the armed forces in political discourse is reiterated.

New Delhi, May 23 (NationPress) BJP MP Nishikant Dubey criticized the Congress party on Friday for its inconsistent stance regarding Operation Sindoor. He stated that the magnitude of the operation not only left the enemy astonished but also surprised the longstanding party. In an interview with IANS, Dubey highlighted Congress' history of questioning its own armed forces while seemingly siding with adversaries, to the point of adopting their rhetoric.

"The Opposition failed to grasp how such a significant strike could occur without entering Pakistani territory, and they incessantly demanded evidence of the surgical strike. Now, that evidence has come to light," he remarked.

“Our military unleashed a barrage on Pakistani installations. This was made possible due to substantial defense acquisitions and the enhancement of our indigenous defense capabilities. Our homegrown technologies thwarted aerial assaults, while Made in India weaponry wreaked havoc in Pakistan. Congress' continual skepticism about Operation Sindoor merely reflects its own frustration,” the BJP MP asserted.

He also condemned Congress for leveraging Donald Trump’s claims of mediation as a political tool, stating, "Congress lacks faith in its own Army and Prime Minister. In pursuit of vote bank politics, it puts its trust in Pakistan."

“Perhaps they should rename themselves the Pakistani Congress Party,” he said, delivering a pointed rebuke.

When asked about Rahul Gandhi's persistent questioning of the government, especially regarding External Affairs Minister Jaishankar’s ‘admission’ that India notified Pakistan before the military operation, he responded, “What could be more unfortunate? Have you ever seen the BJP challenge the Army?”

“We too have experienced being in the opposition. Except for a few years, Congress governed this nation for 60 years. Even then, we never questioned the Army. In this nation, the Army is beyond reproach. We take pride in our Army,” he concluded.

Point of View

It's imperative to present an unbiased perspective. The ongoing discourse around Operation Sindoor reveals deep political divides. While the BJP emphasizes national pride and military achievements, Congress raises concerns over transparency and accountability. It's crucial to navigate these discussions with a focus on national unity and the integrity of our armed forces.
NationPress
08/06/2025

Frequently Asked Questions

What is Operation Sindoor?
Operation Sindoor refers to a military operation conducted by India across the border aimed at neutralizing terrorist threats and protecting national security.
Why did Nishikant Dubey criticize Congress?
Nishikant Dubey criticized Congress for its inconsistent stance and skepticism regarding the efficacy and evidence of Operation Sindoor.
What were the implications of Operation Sindoor?
The implications of Operation Sindoor include enhanced national security, improved defense capabilities, and significant political ramifications domestically.
How did Congress respond to Dubey's comments?
Congress has expressed concerns over the government's transparency and has questioned the narrative surrounding Operation Sindoor.
What does the public think about the military's actions?
Public opinion varies, with some supporting the military actions taken for national security while others call for accountability and transparency.