Iqbal Ansari on Swara Bhaskar's Ram temple remark: 'Digging past does no good'

Share:
Audio Loading voice…
Iqbal Ansari on Swara Bhaskar's Ram temple remark: 'Digging past does no good'

Synopsis

The man who litigated against the Ram temple for decades is now asking an actress to stop relitigating it publicly. Iqbal Ansari's appeal — steeped in the lived reality of Ayodhya's interfaith peace — is a far more powerful rebuttal to Swara Bhaskar's remarks than any political counter, precisely because it comes from a Muslim litigant who accepted the Supreme Court's verdict and chose coexistence over grievance.

Key Takeaways

Former Babri Masjid litigant Iqbal Ansari on 18 September urged actress Swara Bhaskar to refrain from commenting on the 2019 Ram Janmabhoomi verdict .
Ansari said 'not even a leaf was disturbed' across India following the Supreme Court ruling, and that all communities had accepted it respectfully.
Swara Bhaskar reportedly said in a recent interview that the verdict caused her pain, that she felt it was 'very unfair,' and that she texted Shah Rukh Khan and Salman Khan seeking forgiveness.
Ansari emphasised that Ayodhya's Hindus and Muslims are living in communal harmony and called for the past not to be 'dug up.' The Ram Mandir was consecrated in January 2024 following the Supreme Court's unanimous November 2019 verdict awarding the disputed site for temple construction.

Former Babri Masjid-Ram Janmabhoomi litigant Iqbal Ansari on Friday, 18 September responded to actress Swara Bhaskar's controversial remarks about the 2019 Supreme Court verdict on Ram Janmabhoomi, asserting that the judgment had been accepted with respect across the country and that revisiting the matter serves no constructive purpose. Speaking from Ayodhya, Ansari underlined that the verdict had not caused communal unrest anywhere in India.

What Iqbal Ansari Said

Ansari, one of the most prominent litigants in the decades-long Ram Janmabhoomi dispute, was measured but firm in his response. 'The Ram Temple verdict was a court decision, and people across the country respected it. Not even a leaf was disturbed anywhere in the country,' he said.

He urged that further commentary on the matter be avoided given that the court had already delivered its ruling. 'If anyone says anything regarding the Ram Temple verdict, it should be avoided, because people across the country had respected the decision of the court,' Ansari said.

He added: 'The decision has come, Ram Mandir has been built, prayers and rituals have been completed, people flock to the temple with complete devotion. Swara Bhaskar should avoid speaking on the matter, because all the people of the country have accepted the verdict respectfully.'

A Call for Communal Harmony

Ansari, who hails from Ayodhya, contextualised his appeal within the broader fabric of local interfaith relations. 'When all the people are coming and worshipping the deity, when there is no bias or discrimination… Raising an issue of the past can bring no good, because we are residents of Ayodhya. We want Hindus and Muslims of the region to live in peace together with communal harmony. Lord Ram was born there. Hindus should be able to worship the deity,' he said.

His remarks are notable precisely because of who he is — a Muslim litigant who stood on the opposing side of the case for years, and who has since repeatedly counselled acceptance of the court's decision as the path to lasting peace in Ayodhya.

What Swara Bhaskar Said

The controversy was triggered after actress Swara Bhaskar stated in a recent interview that the 2019 Supreme Court verdict on the Ram Janmabhoomi case caused her considerable pain and that she felt the ruling was 'very unfair.' According to reports, she said she was 'really upset' about the judgment and that she 'did not agree' with it.

Bhaskar reportedly added that she had personally texted Muslim contacts in her phone — including prominent film stars Shah Rukh Khan and Salman Khan — to express her feelings and seek their forgiveness. The remarks drew sharp reactions from several quarters, prompting responses from public figures including Ansari.

Background: The Supreme Court Verdict

The Supreme Court of India delivered its unanimous verdict in the Ram Janmabhoomi-Babri Masjid title dispute in November 2019, awarding the disputed 2.77-acre site in Ayodhya to the Hindu side for the construction of a Ram temple, while directing the government to allot an alternative 5-acre plot to the Sunni Waqf Board for a mosque. The Ram Mandir was subsequently consecrated in January 2024, in a nationally televised ceremony attended by Prime Minister Narendra Modi. The case had been one of the most contentious legal and political disputes in independent India's history, spanning several decades.

What Happens Next

Ansari's appeal for restraint reflects a wider sentiment among community leaders in Ayodhya who have consistently prioritised local peace over national political debates. Whether Bhaskar responds to the pushback remains to be seen. The episode, however, has once again surfaced the fault lines around public commentary on sensitive judicial verdicts — and the responsibilities that come with a large public platform.

Point of View

Whatever their intent, reopen a wound that community leaders on both sides of the original dispute have worked to close. The episode also raises a wider question about the limits of celebrity commentary on contested judicial history: when a court has ruled, and when the communities most directly affected have chosen peace, what purpose does continued public dissent serve beyond signalling?
NationPress
18 Sept 2026

Frequently Asked Questions

What did Iqbal Ansari say about Swara Bhaskar's Ram temple remarks?
Iqbal Ansari, a former Babri Masjid-Ram Janmabhoomi litigant, said on 18 September that Swara Bhaskar should avoid commenting on the Ram temple verdict because the entire country had accepted the Supreme Court's decision respectfully. He also stressed that no communal unrest had followed the ruling and that 'digging the past' serves no good.
What did Swara Bhaskar say about the Ram Janmabhoomi verdict?
Swara Bhaskar reportedly said in a recent interview that the 2019 Supreme Court verdict on Ram Janmabhoomi gave her pain and that she felt it was 'very unfair.' According to reports, she said she did not agree with the judgment and had personally texted Muslim contacts — including Shah Rukh Khan and Salman Khan — seeking their forgiveness.
Who is Iqbal Ansari and why do his remarks matter?
Iqbal Ansari is one of the foremost Muslim litigants in the decades-long Ram Janmabhoomi title dispute. His significance lies in the fact that he accepted the Supreme Court's 2019 verdict despite being on the opposing side, and has since consistently called for communal harmony in Ayodhya — making his appeal to Bhaskar more than a political response.
What was the 2019 Supreme Court verdict on Ram Janmabhoomi?
In November 2019, a unanimous Supreme Court bench awarded the disputed 2.77-acre site in Ayodhya to the Hindu side for construction of a Ram temple. It also directed the government to provide an alternative 5-acre plot to the Sunni Waqf Board for a mosque. The Ram Mandir was consecrated in January 2024.
Is there communal tension in Ayodhya following Swara Bhaskar's remarks?
There are no reports of communal tension in Ayodhya linked to Bhaskar's remarks. Iqbal Ansari himself stressed that Hindus and Muslims in Ayodhya are living together in peace and communal harmony, and that local community leaders want that to continue.
Nation Press
The Trail

Connected Dots

Tracing the thread behind this story — newest first.

8 Dots
  1. Latest 2 weeks ago
  2. 2 months ago
  3. 2 months ago
  4. 2 months ago
  5. 2 months ago
  6. 3 months ago
  7. 7 months ago
  8. 1 year ago
Google Prefer NP
On Google