No notice issued to C.N. Rao over SIR electoral roll revision, clarifies GBA Chief
Synopsis
Key Takeaways
No notice has been issued to Bharat Ratna awardee and celebrated scientist Professor C.N. Rao in connection with the Special Intensive Revision (SIR) of electoral rolls in Bengaluru, the city's top election official clarified on Wednesday, 9 September. Maheshwar Rao, Bengaluru City District Election Officer and Chief Commissioner of the Greater Bengaluru Authority (GBA), issued the clarification after media reports incorrectly claimed the 92-year-old scientist had been served a notice over a name discrepancy in voter records.
What Actually Happened at Professor Rao's Residence
According to Maheshwar Rao, officials — including the state's SVEEP nodal officer and the Commissioner of the Bengaluru West City Municipal Corporation — personally visited Professor C.N. Rao's residence as part of the SIR exercise. They delivered Enumeration Forms in person and assisted the family in filling in the required details. No summons, no hearing notice, and no demand for identity proof was issued to the scientist.
The Name Discrepancy in Electoral Records
The confusion stemmed from a long-standing inconsistency in Professor Rao's voter registration history. As per the Election Officer, Professor C.N. Rao was first listed as an elector in Part No. 129, Serial No. 431 of the electoral roll of the erstwhile 76-Malleswaram Assembly constituency in 2002, where his name was recorded simply as 'Ram'.
He is currently registered in Part No. 59, Serial No. 187 of the 157-Malleswaram Assembly constituency under the name 'Professor C.N. Rao M', and this name has been included in the draft electoral roll. Media reports had separately claimed that an older entry read 'Prof C.N.R. Rao' while a current entry carried a typographical error — 'Proff C.N.R. Rao' — with an additional 'f' in the professional title, reportedly triggering a 'self-name mismatch' flag.
How the Booth Level Officer Handled the Case
Despite the documented discrepancy in name records, Maheshwar Rao was categorical: the Booth Level Officer (BLO) did not issue any notice to Professor Rao in connection with the SIR hearing process. Recognising the scientist's standing as a 'respected person', the BLO instead recommended that his name be retained and included in the final electoral roll. Necessary steps have since been initiated to formalise that inclusion, the Election Officer confirmed.
Setting the Record Straight
The episode highlights the risks of miscommunication during large-scale electoral verification drives. The SIR process, currently underway across Karnataka, involves door-to-door enumeration and reconciliation of voter data — a routine but administratively complex exercise. This is not the first time a high-profile individual has been inadvertently caught in the crossfire of voter roll clean-up drives, with media reports occasionally conflating routine enumeration visits with formal legal notices.
Notably, the clarification from GBA Chief Commissioner Maheshwar Rao effectively closes the chapter on reports that Professor C.N. Rao — one of India's most decorated scientists and a Bharat Ratna recipient — had been summoned to establish his identity at a hearing near the Indian Institute of Science (IISc) in Malleshwaram.