Why Did the Court Reject Prajwal Revanna's Second Bail Petition?
Click to start listening
Synopsis
In a significant ruling, the Special Court for MP/MLA cases in Bengaluru has once again denied the bail petition of Prajwal Revanna, the former JD(S) MP accused of serious crimes. What implications does this have for the case and for Prajwal's future?
Key Takeaways
- Prajwal Revanna has faced multiple legal challenges.
- The court process emphasizes the seriousness of the allegations.
- Legal representation plays a crucial role in such high-profile cases.
- Public interest remains high in this ongoing legal battle.
- The implications of the case extend beyond individual charges.
Bengaluru, July 25 (NationPress) – The Special Court dealing with MP/MLA cases in Bengaluru has denied the bail request made by former JD(S) MP Prajwal Revanna in relation to the alleged sexual assault of a domestic worker. This marks the second occasion that Prajwal has sought bail from the court.
Prajwal Revanna, who is the grandson of former Prime Minister H.D. Deve Gowda, submitted a new bail application, asserting that there were changes in circumstances since his previous request was denied last year.
Despite this, the court dismissed his petition without hesitation. Vikram Huilgol, Prajwal's attorney, argued that his client has been in custody for 14 months and noted that another defendant in this case, H.D. Revanna—Prajwal's father and a JD(S) MLA—had secured a stay order from the High Court. He contended that this precedent should allow for Prajwal's bail as well.
On the other hand, the attorneys representing the Special Investigation Team (SIT) opposed the bail request and urged the court to deny it. After considering both arguments, the court ruled against the bail application.
Previously, on July 9, the Karnataka High Court instructed Prajwal Revanna, who is the main suspect in the obscene video case, to submit a second bail petition to the trial court, mandating that the lower court resolve the issue within 10 days.
Senior Advocate Prabhuling Navadgi, representing Prajwal, contended that the High Court had the power and discretion to directly address the bail petition rather than referring it to the trial court. However, the bench insisted he first seek resolution from the trial court.
In response to this directive, Prajwal Revanna filed a new bail application with the trial court, citing altered circumstances since the prior rejection.
Currently, Prajwal Revanna remains incarcerated at Bengaluru Central Prison, facing a total of four rape charges against him.
Point of View
It is essential to recognize the weight of the allegations against Prajwal Revanna. The legal proceedings must be handled with utmost seriousness, ensuring justice is served while respecting the rights of all parties involved. NationPress remains committed to covering this case with the integrity and thoroughness it deserves.
NationPress
26/07/2025
Frequently Asked Questions
What were the reasons for the bail petition rejection?
The court dismissed the bail petition due to the serious nature of the allegations and the arguments presented by the Special Investigation Team, emphasizing the need for justice.
How many cases are against Prajwal Revanna?
A total of four rape cases have been registered against Prajwal Revanna.
What will happen next in the legal proceedings?
Prajwal Revanna will remain in custody while the legal process continues, and further hearings will take place as scheduled by the court.
Who is representing Prajwal Revanna?
Senior Advocate Prabhuling Navadgi is representing Prajwal Revanna in this case.
What is the background of Prajwal Revanna?
Prajwal Revanna is the grandson of former Prime Minister H.D. Deve Gowda and has previously served as a Member of Parliament for the JD(S).
