Did Pawar Really Get an Offer to 'Fix' 160 Assembly Seats?

Click to start listening
Did Pawar Really Get an Offer to 'Fix' 160 Assembly Seats?

Synopsis

Sharad Pawar's startling claims about election manipulation raise eyebrows. Did he truly receive offers to 'fix' 160 assembly seats? Maharashtra's political landscape is buzzing with accusations and rebuttals. Dive into the unfolding drama surrounding the integrity of the electoral process and the responses from key political figures.

Key Takeaways

  • Sharad Pawar alleged that he was approached to manipulate election results.
  • He arranged a meeting with Rahul Gandhi to discuss these claims.
  • Devendra Fadnavis dismissed the allegations as political theatrics.
  • Calls for investigation underscore the importance of electoral integrity.
  • Political dynamics in Maharashtra remain tense and contentious.

Nagpur, Aug 9 (NationPress) - NCP (SP) leader Sharad Pawar stated on Saturday that prior to last year's Maharashtra Assembly elections, two individuals approached him with a "guarantee" to ensure victory in 160 out of the 288 seats in the state.

"I was taken aback. I chose to disregard those two individuals. At that point, I had no doubts regarding the Election Commission. I facilitated their meeting with Rahul Gandhi. Afterward, they conveyed their intentions to Rahul Gandhi. However, both Rahul Gandhi and I agreed not to take them seriously, as this was not our approach. We resolved to engage with the public and seek their mandate during the assembly elections," Pawar recounted.

Pawar shared these insights during a press conference attended by state party leader Shashikant Shinde, former home ministers Anil Deshmukh and Jitendra Awhad, and state general secretary Rohit Pawar, among others.

He asserted that those two individuals had mentioned plans to manipulate votes in 160 constituencies. He emphasized that he chose to disregard these claims and instead sought the direct mandate of the people. Pawar backed Rahul Gandhi’s initiative to address concerns of vote theft and election rigging.

"A comprehensive investigation into the allegations raised by Rahul Gandhi is essential, and we demand answers from the Election Commission, not from the BJP," Pawar stressed.

Awhad supported Pawar’s narrative, confirming that two individuals had approached party chief Sharad Pawar regarding vote manipulation in 160 seats. However, Pawar dismissed their claims, asserting that such actions were impossible.

In contrast, Maharashtra Chief Minister Devendra Fadnavis outrightly dismissed these claims. He remarked, "I find it perplexing why Pawar Saheb recalled all this only after meeting Rahul Gandhi, and especially after such a long time?"

"Sharad Pawar remained silent for so long, but today he suddenly made this revelation. Just like Rahul Gandhi, who concocts fanciful tales daily, is Pawar Saheb doing the same?" he mocked.

Fadnavis further asserted, "Even if opponents stir confusion, elections in India are conducted freely and fairly. They publicly accuse EVMs and the electoral process, yet when summoned by the Election Commission, they refuse to appear. They are unwilling to submit an affidavit. They claim to have taken an oath in Parliament. But does that oath hold any weight in the Supreme Court or high courts? They are aware that if caught lying, they could face criminal repercussions. Thus, they continue to fabricate stories and evade accountability."

Point of View

We must approach this situation with a commitment to unbiased reporting. The allegations made by Sharad Pawar should be investigated thoroughly, and the responses from political leaders should be scrutinized. It is essential to uphold the principles of transparency and accountability in our democracy while ensuring that all parties are heard fairly.
NationPress
08/09/2025

Frequently Asked Questions

What did Sharad Pawar claim regarding the Maharashtra elections?
Sharad Pawar claimed that two individuals offered him a 'guarantee' to secure victories in 160 out of 288 seats during the last Maharashtra Assembly elections.
How did Devendra Fadnavis respond to Pawar's claims?
Devendra Fadnavis dismissed Pawar's claims as unfounded and questioned why Pawar only remembered these details after meeting Rahul Gandhi.
What did Pawar request from the Election Commission?
Pawar called for a thorough investigation into the allegations of vote manipulation and demanded answers from the Election Commission, not the BJP.
Who supported Pawar's claims during the press conference?
Jitendra Awhad corroborated Pawar's account, stating that two individuals did approach him with offers regarding vote manipulation.
What broader implications does this situation have?
This situation raises concerns about electoral integrity and the accountability of political figures, emphasizing the need for transparency in the electoral process.