Did Police File a Case Against Four Individuals Over a Parody Song Related to the Sabarimala Gold Controversy?
Click to start listening
Synopsis
A case has been filed against four individuals for a parody song that allegedly hurts religious sentiments, sparking controversies around freedom of expression and political tactics. Thiruvananthapuram Cyber Police took action based on a complaint from a local religious group, igniting debates on political influence and artistic freedom.
Key Takeaways
- Thiruvananthapuram Cyber Police initiated a case over a viral parody song.
- The case raises questions about freedom of expression.
- Accusations include hurting religious sentiments.
- Political figures express differing views on the issue.
- Social media discussions highlight public sentiment on censorship.
Thiruvananthapuram, Dec 17 (NationPress) — On Wednesday, the Cyber Police of Thiruvananthapuram initiated legal proceedings concerning the viral parody song "Pottiye Kettiye", which gained popularity during the local body election campaign.
The Thiruvananthapuram City Cyber Police acted on a complaint lodged by Prasad Kuzhikkala, the general secretary of the Thiruvabharana Patha Samrakshana Samithi. The complaint alleges the inappropriate use of a devotional song, which reportedly hurt religious sentiments.
Four individuals, including the songwriter, are now facing charges. The accused are Kunjabdulla, Danish Malappuram, CMS Media, and Subair Panthalloor.
Authorities have registered the case under allegations of causing offense to religious feelings and fostering discord among communities.
The police confirmed that this action was taken following legal counsel.
The parody song, featuring the catchy line “Pottiye Kettiye, swarnam chembayi maariye”, was extensively utilized by the UDF during their election strategies.
KPCC Working President and MLA P.C. Vishnunath questioned whether the CPI(M) has become a party that fears a song.
“The act of filing a complaint over a parody song is a greater comedy than the parody itself,” Vishnunath remarked, portraying the CPI-M’s situation as unfortunate.
In response, the CPI-M is contemplating contacting the Election Commission, asserting that the song constitutes a significant breach of the Model Code of Conduct.
CPI-M Pathanamthitta district secretary Raju Abraham accused the Congress and the Muslim League of using the parody song in a manner that incites harmful polarization.
Social media platforms are alive with discussions, as users express concern over what they perceive as double standards from the CPI(M), which has frequently lamented restrictions on freedom of expression.
In 2022, Chief Minister Pinarayi Vijayan took to social media when Malayalam author Harish was threatened by a right-wing group for allegedly misrepresenting Hindu women in his novel ‘Meesha’.
“We will not stand for an infringement on the right to write freely. Creativity flourishes only in a fearless environment. Harish, the writer of ‘Meesha’, should not be discouraged by controversies. The best response to controversy is to continue writing boldly and fearlessly. He must navigate this crisis through the power of his writing,” the Chief Minister had stated.
Point of View
The recent case involving the parody song reflects ongoing tensions between artistic expression and religious sentiments. It is essential to balance the right to free speech with respect for diverse beliefs. As this situation unfolds, it will be crucial for authorities to address these issues with sensitivity and fairness.
NationPress
17/12/2025
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the reason behind the police case?
The case has been filed due to allegations of the parody song 'Pottiye Kettiye' hurting religious sentiments and misusing a devotional song.
Who are the individuals accused in the case?
The accused include lyricist Kunjabdulla, Danish Malappuram, CMS Media, and Subair Panthalloor.
What are the potential legal consequences they face?
The individuals face charges of offending religious sentiments and promoting enmity between groups.
What has been the public reaction to this case?
Social media is buzzing with discussions, with many criticizing the CPI(M) for its perceived double standards regarding freedom of expression.
How has the Chief Minister responded to similar issues in the past?
Chief Minister Pinarayi Vijayan has previously defended artistic freedom, emphasizing the importance of a fearless creative environment.
