Why Did the Mahayuti Government Omit Parth Pawar's Name in the Pune Land Deal FIR?

Click to start listening
Why Did the Mahayuti Government Omit Parth Pawar's Name in the Pune Land Deal FIR?

Synopsis

The omission of Parth Pawar's name from the FIR in the Pune land deal has stirred significant controversy. Opposition parties and activists are demanding accountability and transparency from the Mahayuti government, raising questions about the integrity of the investigation. Could this be a case of political protection? Read on for an in-depth analysis.

Key Takeaways

  • The Mahayuti government faces criticism for omitting Parth Pawar from the FIR.
  • Opposition leaders are demanding accountability and a thorough investigation.
  • Activists call for a committee to ensure a fair inquiry.
  • The controversy highlights issues of corruption in government.
  • Political favoritism may be influencing the investigation.

Mumbai, Nov 7 (NationPress) Opposition factions and anti-corruption advocates expressed strong criticism towards the Mahayuti government for neglecting to mention the name of Deputy Chief Minister Ajit Pawar's son, Parth Pawar, a partner in Amedea Enterprises LLP, in the FIR related to the multi-crore transaction involving a 40-acre plot of Mahar Watan land (designated as government land) in Mundhwa Koregaon Park.

Shiv Sena (UBT) head and former opposition leader in the state council, Ambadas Danve, noted on X, "In the Koregaon Park matter, an FIR has been filed, yet Parth Pawar's name or his company's designation is conspicuously absent! This indicates that the government's deceptive tactics have commenced, and that too within a mere 24 hours of the case surfacing. This is unacceptable, Chief Minister @Dev_Fadnavis sir. The officials investigating this issue, including additional chief secretary Vikas Kharge, are known for their integrity. However, given the names involved, the government should appoint a retired judge to conduct a thorough investigation."

Congress Legislature Party leader Vijay Wadettiwar also insisted that a case be filed against Parth Pawar.

He further stated that Ajit Pawar should step down.

"In the Pune land scam, Amedea Enterprises LLP is implicated, with Parth Pawar's signature present. Thus, why is the case only targeting Digvijay Patil? The Mahayuti government implies a system where you benefit, I benefit, and we protect each other," Wadettiwar asserted. He reiterated his call for charges against Parth Pawar.

"In the Pune land scam, it is now claimed that Digvijay Patil was authorized for the transaction, but where did the funds originate? Who executed the transaction, and what led to the stamp duty exemption? There are ongoing efforts to shield Parth Pawar; therefore, a committee should be established under a High Court judge to investigate this matter. All officials from the revenue and industries departments, including Sheetal Tejwani, should face scrutiny," demanded Wadettiwar.

He emphasized that Ajit Pawar cannot simply evade responsibility by claiming ignorance.

Anti-corruption activist Anjali Damania also condemned the exclusion of Parth Pawar from the FIR.

In her post on X, she remarked, "An FIR has been initiated, yet a scam persists? Parth Pawar's name is omitted, and the company's designation is missing. Why? Is there an agenda to protect him? End the political games. Initiate a genuine investigation and administer justice."

She added, "The forthcoming committee should not consist solely of government representatives but should also include public members. I am prepared to represent this perspective."

Former Maharashtra Navnirman Sena legislator Raju Patil commented that the Pune land dispute stemmed from ongoing conflicts among the three ruling allies: BJP, Shiv Sena, and NCP.

"Currently, there is intense competition to perpetrate scams within the government. The prevailing mindset is to act with impunity, believing that those in Delhi will manage the fallout. What can happen at worst? The scam will be uncovered, correct? If exposed, simply retreat, implying no investigation will ensue. A recent example is the 4000 crore tender scam in the MMRDA department's Thane-Borivali tunnel, which was detected; re-tenders were issued, yet no inquiry into the scam's execution or perpetrators was conducted," Patil stated.

He further remarked, "The Pune Rs 300 crore Jain boarding scam was revealed, cancelled, and subsequently forgotten. No investigation was undertaken. Now, the Pune land scam is emerging. Nothing will transpire in this case either, as the current power holders operate under the principle: steal without fear, and if caught, return the stolen items and prepare to steal again. They have likely received assurances from their Delhi superiors."

Point of View

Our commitment to integrity and transparency remains paramount. The exclusion of Parth Pawar's name from the FIR raises critical questions about accountability within the Mahayuti government. It is essential that a thorough investigation is conducted to uphold the public's trust and ensure justice prevails.
NationPress
08/11/2025

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the Pune land deal controversy about?
The controversy revolves around the omission of Parth Pawar's name from an FIR related to a multi-crore deal involving government land.
Who has been criticized for this omission?
Opposition parties and anti-corruption activists have criticized the Mahayuti government for excluding Parth Pawar's name from the FIR.
What are the demands of the opposition?
Opposition leaders are demanding that a case be filed against Parth Pawar and calling for a transparent investigation into the land deal.
What actions are being proposed for a fair inquiry?
Activists suggest forming a committee under a High Court judge, including public representatives, to investigate the matter thoroughly.
Why is the Pune land deal significant?
The deal is significant due to its implications for corruption in government dealings and the potential protection of powerful individuals.
Nation Press