Is Qutub Minar a Vedshala Instead of a Minaret?
Synopsis
Former ASI Director Dharamveer Sharma's bold assertion that Qutub Minar was originally a Vedhshala has reignited debates about the historical identity of this iconic structure. His compelling arguments challenge long-held views, raising questions about its true purpose and construction.
Key Takeaways
Dharamveer Sharma claims Qutub Minar is a Vedhshala .
The structure's foundation is oblong, suggesting a different purpose.
It leans 25 feet to the south, indicating intentional design.
On June 21, it casts no shadow for half an hour.
Controversies about its historical significance persist.
New Delhi, Jan 3 (NationPress) Dharamveer Sharma, the former regional director of the Archaeological Survey of India (ASI), asserted on Saturday that the renowned Qutub Minar in the capital was originally a Vedhshala (an ancient astronomical observatory) rather than merely a minaret. He provided substantial evidence to support his assertions.
During his address at the Shabdotsav 2026 event, Sharma stated, "I refer to Qutub Minar as a VedhShala for a specific reason. Every monument, temple, or building is constructed with a clear vision and purpose. For a structure shaped in a circle, its base should ideally be circular; however, the foundation here is oblong in shape."
Reflecting on his extensive research on the monument, he revealed that he uncovered numerous lesser-known facts regarding the structure that are rarely mentioned in available records.
“Every building is designed with a purpose, which is evident in its foundation. The foundation was excavated in 1954, and while one might expect a circular base for a circular structure, it is indeed oblong, measuring 62 feet in length and 52 feet in width,” he explained.
Adding another layer to his argument, he pointed out that the Qutub Minar leans 25 feet towards the south, indicating a deliberate architectural choice. “For such a tilted structure to endure, it must have robust cantilever support, which the builders indeed incorporated.”
He further elucidated that on June 21, the summer solstice, the sun enters Dakshinayan, and for a half-hour, the shadow of Qutub Minar does not touch the ground.
“This serves as undeniable evidence that it functioned as a Vedhshala in its original form,” he stated, reinforcing the widely circulated belief that the monument was altered by invading forces, who transformed its original identity.
Previously, Qutub Minar has been a topic of controversy, with claims from Hindu groups that the structure was built by demolishing the ‘Vishnu Stambh’ and other temples, while official accounts classify it as a minaret from the Mughal period.
Sharma's articulate insights are poised to stir further debates, eliciting reactions from various communities.
Acharya Mithilesh Nandini Sharan, the leader of Hanuman Niwas Peeth in Ayodhya Dham, responded to these 'revelations' by stating, "This matter has been longstanding. He hasn't introduced it as a political issue; he is an author who has conducted research. He shared findings from his investigations."
Point of View
I recognize the importance of Dharamveer Sharma's claims regarding Qutub Minar. His extensive research into the monument challenges established narratives and opens up crucial discussions about India's historical heritage. It's vital to approach such revelations with an open mind while considering the broader implications for our understanding of architectural history.
NationPress
11 May 2026
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the Qutub Minar?
The Qutub Minar is a towering minaret located in Delhi, India, built during the Mughal era.
What did the former ASI director claim?
Dharamveer Sharma claimed that Qutub Minar was originally a Vedhshala, an ancient observatory for studying astronomy.
What evidence did Sharma provide?
He pointed out the oblong foundation and the structure's tilt as indicators of its purpose, along with its unique shadow behavior during solstices.
Are there controversies surrounding Qutub Minar?
Yes, various groups have claimed that it was built by destroying Hindu temples, leading to debates about its history.
What are the implications of Sharma's claims?
His assertions could reshape our understanding of historical monuments and their significance in Indian culture.
