Rijiju fires back at Kharge, defines 'Dimaagi Naxal'
Synopsis
Key Takeaways
A sharp political exchange landed in India's public discourse on Wednesday, November 4, 2026, when Union Parliamentary Affairs and Minority Affairs Minister Kiren Rijiju directly responded to Congress president Mallikarjun Kharge — drawing a crisp, four-point definition of who exactly qualifies as a 'Dimaagi Naxal.'
Four categories, one cutting reply
Rijiju's post was precise. 'Kharge Ji, Dimaagi Naxal is a term not a narrative,' he wrote — and then dismantled any ambiguity by enumerating exactly four categories: those who support the Maoist agenda and reject the Indian Constitution; those who stand with separatists and back Article 370; those who seek to obstruct India's development projects; and those who conspire to 'cut the chicken neck' — a pointed reference to severing the Siliguri Corridor, the narrow land bridge connecting mainland India to the Northeast.
That last point carries particular weight coming from Rijiju, a senior BJP leader from Arunachal Pradesh. For him, the security of the Northeast is not an abstraction — it is the geography he represents.
The Siliguri Corridor: why 'chicken neck' cuts deep
The Siliguri Corridor in West Bengal is roughly 22 kilometres wide at its narrowest point — the only land link between eight northeastern states and the rest of India. Any threat to it, real or rhetorical, triggers alarm across security and strategic circles. Rijiju's invocation of it frames the opposition's alleged positions not merely as political disagreement, but as a potential national-security risk. That framing is deliberate and potent.
Article 370, Maoism, and BJP's established political playbook
The post draws on three distinct but recurring BJP political arguments: the 2019 abrogation of Article 370, which removed Jammu and Kashmir's special constitutional status; the government's intensified anti-Naxal operations, particularly across central and eastern India's 'Red Corridor'; and the Act East Policy, under which successive infrastructure projects have been launched to integrate the Northeast with the national mainstream since 2014.
Taken together, Rijiju is not coining a phrase — he is deploying an established ideological vocabulary and daring the Congress leadership to contest each of its four pillars individually. That is the structural intelligence of the post. It moves the burden of proof.
Kharge's challenge and the floor it sets
Congress president Mallikarjun Kharge, also the Leader of Opposition in the Rajya Sabha, had presumably objected to or questioned the use of the 'Dimaagi Naxal' label — the term, loosely translated, means 'intellectual Naxal' or 'Naxal in thought.' Rijiju's response signals that the BJP intends to defend the term, not retreat from it. With Parliament's winter session on the horizon, this exchange may well be a preview of the floor battles ahead.
The term's staying power — and the sharper fight over who it describes — is only beginning.