Rijiju: Exam Malpractice Bill Passed by Both Houses
Synopsis
Key Takeaways
The future of millions of Indian students just got a legislative shield. Union Parliamentary Affairs Minister Kiren Rijiju announced on 30 July 2026 that the Public Examinations (Prevention of Unfair Means) Amendment Bill, 2026 has been passed by both Houses of Parliament — a decisive move to crush paper leak networks and restore faith in the country's high-stakes examination system.
Two years after the original law, Parliament tightens the screws
The 2026 amendment builds on the Public Examinations (Prevention of Unfair Means) Act, 2024, which first criminalised paper leaks, impersonation, and organised malpractice in government recruitment and entrance examinations. That law was itself a direct response to a wave of high-profile exam scandals — including controversies around NEET and multiple state-level recruitment tests — that shook public trust and derailed the careers of lakhs of aspirants. Two years on, Parliament has decided the original framework needed sharper teeth.
Rijiju framed the amendment in unambiguous terms: 'Merit will prevail. Malpractice will pay.' Those who 'manipulate examinations, run paper leak networks or attempt to steal the future of our youth,' he warned, 'will face the strictest action. No one who plays with the future of our students will be spared.'
Why paper leaks became a national crisis
India's examination ecosystem — spanning UPSC, SSC, state PSCs, NEET, JEE and dozens of recruitment boards — serves as the single most consequential gateway for crores of young Indians. A leaked question paper does not just hand an unfair advantage to a few; it invalidates years of honest preparation for hundreds of thousands. Successive leaks had exposed how organised syndicates operate across state lines, exploiting gaps in oversight and enforcement. The 2024 Act was a start. The 2026 amendment signals that the legislative response is still catching up with the scale of the problem.
What changes now — and what to watch
With both the Lok Sabha and Rajya Sabha having cleared the bill, the next critical phase is the notification of rules under the amended Act and its application to upcoming recruitment cycles. Exam bodies, vigilance agencies, and state governments will now need to align their enforcement machinery with the strengthened provisions. The real test of the law will come not in Parliament, but in how swiftly and visibly it is used the next time a leak surfaces.
For now, the message from the floor of Parliament is clear: India's exam system is not a market for manipulation. The aspirants grinding through early mornings and late nights deserve nothing less.