Did SC Collegium Suggest Permanent Judges for Karnataka, Madras, and Tripura High Courts?
Click to start listening
Synopsis
In a significant development, the Supreme Court Collegium has recommended the appointment of permanent judges across three high courts. With key appointments proposed, including Justices for Karnataka, Madras, and Tripura, this marks a pivotal moment in the judicial landscape. Stay tuned to explore the implications of these recommendations.
Key Takeaways
- The Supreme Court Collegium has recommended permanent judges for three High Courts.
- Key appointments include justices for Karnataka, Madras, and Tripura.
- The recommendations were made under the leadership of CJI B.R. Gavai.
- Appointments aim to strengthen the judiciary.
- The final decision rests with the President of India.
New Delhi, Sep 16 (NationPress) The Supreme Court Collegium, headed by Chief Justice of India (CJI) B.R. Gavai, has put forward recommendations for the appointment of permanent judges in the Karnataka, Madras, and Tripura High Courts.
In a resolution released on the official website of the Apex Court, it was stated, "The Supreme Court Collegium, during its meeting on 15th September 2025, has endorsed the proposal to appoint Shri Justice Kurubarahalli Venkataramareddy Aravind, currently an Additional Judge, as a Permanent Judge in the High Court of Karnataka."
Additionally, the Collegium has sanctioned the appointment of two Additional Judges, Justices N. Senthilkumar and G. Arul Murugan, as Judges of the Madras High Court.
Moreover, the Collegium has also approved the proposal for Shri Justice Biswajit Palit, Additional Judge, to be appointed as a Permanent Judge in the High Court of Tripura, as per another announcement from the SC Collegium.
The appointments of Chief Justices and Judges of High Courts are made by the President under clause (1) of Article 217 of the Constitution.
Meanwhile, Additional Judges may also be appointed by the President under clause (1) of Article 224 of the Constitution.
According to the Memorandum of Procedure (MoP) that governs the appointment of High Court judges, the Chief Justice of the High Court should refrain from recommending an Additional Judge when a vacancy for a permanent Judge exists.
In a recent meeting, the Apex Court Collegium has further approved the appointment of judicial officers Geetha Kadaba Bharatharaja Setty, Muralidhara Pai Borkatte, and Tyagaraja Narayan Inavally as Judges of the Karnataka High Court.
Additionally, the Collegium has recommended two advocates, Jiya Lal Bhardwaj and Romesh Verma, for appointment as Judges of the Himachal Pradesh High Court.
Point of View
The recommendations from the Supreme Court Collegium reflect a strategic approach to strengthen the judiciary. By appointing experienced judges, the high courts in Karnataka, Madras, and Tripura are poised to enhance legal proceedings and uphold justice more effectively. This decision underscores the importance of a robust judicial system in our democracy.
NationPress
02/11/2025
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the role of the Supreme Court Collegium?
The Supreme Court Collegium is responsible for recommending the appointment and transfer of judges in the higher judiciary, ensuring that the selection process maintains the integrity and independence of the judiciary.
Who makes the final appointment of judges?
The final appointment of judges to the High Courts is made by the President of India, based on the recommendations provided by the Supreme Court Collegium.
What is the significance of permanent judges?
The appointment of permanent judges is crucial for maintaining judicial consistency and stability, allowing courts to function effectively and uphold the rule of law.
How many judges were recommended for appointment?
The Supreme Court Collegium has recommended several judges, including Justices for Karnataka, Madras, and Tripura High Courts, as well as judicial officers from Karnataka for judgeship.
What is the Memorandum of Procedure (MoP)?
The Memorandum of Procedure (MoP) outlines the process and criteria for appointing judges to the High Courts, ensuring transparency and adherence to constitutional provisions.
