Did SC Rebuke Rahul Gandhi for His 'Irresponsible' Claim About Chinese Occupation?
Click to start listening
Synopsis
In a recent development, the Supreme Court criticized Rahul Gandhi for his comments regarding the Indian Army and Chinese aggression. Kiren Rijiju also joined in the criticism, labeling Gandhi's statements as irresponsible. This situation raises important questions about national discourse and the responsibilities of public figures.
Key Takeaways
- Supreme Court rebukes Rahul Gandhi for his comments on Chinese occupation.
- Kiren Rijiju labels Gandhi's remarks as irresponsible.
- Importance of addressing national issues through the right channels.
- Judicial scrutiny of public statements can impact political discourse.
- Public figures must be cautious with their claims.
New Delhi, Aug 4 (NationPress) - The Supreme Court issued a stern warning to Leader of Opposition in the Lok Sabha, Rahul Gandhi, on Monday over his purported comments that disparaged the Indian Army. Kiren Rijiju, the Union Minister for Parliamentary Affairs, also condemned the Congress MP, labeling his remarks as an "irresponsible claim".
This controversy originated from Gandhi's statement made during the Bharat Jodo Yatra, where he allegedly claimed, "Chinese troops are thrashing Indian Army soldiers in Arunachal Pradesh," referencing the face-off that occurred in the Tawang sector on December 9, 2022.
On X, Rijiju stated, "Supreme Court rebukes Shri Rahul Gandhi for irresponsible claim that Chinese occupied Indian Territory!"
He also shared a direct quote from the court proceedings: "SC: How do you know 2000 Sqr km of Indian territory were occupied by Chinese? A true Indian will not say this."
Furthermore, Rijiju reshared a video from a previous Lok Sabha session where he had vehemently rejected Gandhi's remarks.
In the video, he remarked, "There should be no confusion due to the false narratives of Congress and the left ecosystem regarding India's boundaries."
A bench of Justices Dipankar Datta and Joymalya Bagchi expressed their disapproval of Rahul Gandhi's assertion that 2,000 square kilometers of Indian territory had been seized by China, emphasizing that "if he were a true Indian, he would not have said all this."
Justice Datta posed critical questions to senior advocate Abhishek Manu Singhvi, representing Gandhi, asking, "How do you know that 2,000 square kilometers of Indian territory were occupied by the Chinese? Were you there? Do you have any credible material?"
He further questioned, "When there is a conflict across the order, is it unusual to have casualties on both sides?"
The Supreme Court also pressed, "Whatever you have to say, why don't you say it in Parliament? Why do you have to say this in social media posts?"
These remarks followed Singhvi's argument that it would be an "unfortunate situation" if an opposition leader could not address national concerns in the media.
Point of View
It is essential to remain unbiased and focus on the facts. The Supreme Court's rebuke of Rahul Gandhi serves as a reminder of the responsibility public figures hold in discussing sensitive national issues. It is crucial for leaders to express their concerns through appropriate channels, such as Parliament, rather than social media, to maintain the integrity of national discourse.
NationPress
05/10/2025
Frequently Asked Questions
What did Rahul Gandhi say about the Indian Army?
Rahul Gandhi claimed during the Bharat Jodo Yatra that Chinese troops were beating Indian Army soldiers in Arunachal Pradesh.
What was the Supreme Court's response?
The Supreme Court rebuked Rahul Gandhi, questioning the credibility of his claims regarding Chinese occupation of Indian territory.
Who criticized Rahul Gandhi alongside the Supreme Court?
Union Minister Kiren Rijiju criticized Rahul Gandhi for his 'irresponsible claim' regarding the Indian Army.
What is the significance of this controversy?
This controversy highlights the responsibility of public figures to speak accurately about national security issues and the importance of addressing such matters in Parliament.
How did Kiren Rijiju respond to Gandhi's claims?
Kiren Rijiju expressed that there should be no confusion due to false narratives regarding India's boundaries.
