Why Has the SC Issued a Notice on Sonam Wangchuk’s Detention?

Click to start listening
Why Has the SC Issued a Notice on Sonam Wangchuk’s Detention?

Synopsis

The Supreme Court has taken a significant step by reviewing a plea against climate activist Sonam Wangchuk's detention under the NSA. This case raises critical questions about human rights and governmental authority in India. As the hearing approaches, the implications for activism in the region are profound and warrant public attention.

Key Takeaways

  • Supreme Court reviews the plea against Wangchuk's detention.
  • Wangchuk's wife demands clarity on the grounds for his detention.
  • Centre claims no family member has been denied access, while Sibal argues otherwise.
  • Medical attention for Wangchuk is mandated by the court.
  • The case highlights tensions between activism and legal measures in India.

New Delhi, Oct 6 (NationPress) The Supreme Court has issued a notice regarding a writ petition submitted by Gitanjali J. Angmo, the spouse of Sonam Wangchuk, contesting the detention of the climate activist from Leh under the National Security Act (NSA). A Bench led by Justices Aravind Kumar and N.V. Anjaria requested responses from the Union government and relevant authorities on this issue.

During the proceedings, Solicitor General Tushar Mehta, representing the Centre, stated that the grounds for Wangchuk's detention had already been communicated to him.

However, senior advocate Kapil Sibal, who is defending Wangchuk, noted that no family member had been informed about the grounds of detention. In response, SG Mehta clarified, “The law necessitates service on the detenue, and we have fulfilled that requirement. We will assess the possibility of informing his wife.”

The Bench, led by Justice Kumar, directed the Centre to consider the possibility of providing the detention order to Sonam Wangchuk's wife, acknowledging that the grounds of detention had already been served on the detenue himself.

Sibal further highlighted that Wangchuk's wife had been denied the opportunity to visit him.

In reply, the Centre’s legal representative asserted, “Let’s not create unnecessary hype. No one is being barred. The lawyer and brother of the detenue have visited him in jail.”

SG Mehta added that Wangchuk’s wife's request for a meeting was “currently under consideration.”

The second-highest law officer of the Centre further informed the apex court that Sonam Wangchuk “has indicated to the medical officer that he is not on any medications,” dismissing concerns as “all hype” intended to generate “an emotive atmosphere” in the media.

Nonetheless, the Justice Kumar-led Bench mandated that “the detenue shall receive any necessary medical attention as permitted by existing prison regulations.”

The hearing on this matter is scheduled for next Tuesday.

The Union Ministry of Home Affairs has accused Sonam Wangchuk of inciting violence in Leh. After commencing a hunger strike on September 10, he abandoned it when unrest erupted in the town and was subsequently apprehended under the NSA and transferred to Jodhpur jail in Rajasthan.

Security forces had to resort to firing in self-defense during protests, which led to the tragic deaths of four civilians.

Wangchuk, a renowned activist from Ladakh, is highly regarded for his dedication to education, environmental preservation, and various social initiatives. He has been a strong advocate for educational reforms and sustainable development in Ladakh. Over the years, Wangchuk has gained both national and international acclaim for his contributions towards creating low-cost educational models, fostering environmental conservation, and promoting scientific innovation among students.

Point of View

This issue underscores the delicate balance between national security and individual rights. It is crucial that the judiciary ensures that all legal procedures are followed while maintaining respect for the rights of activists. The upcoming hearings will be pivotal in determining the future of civic freedoms in the region.
NationPress
06/10/2025

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the reason for Sonam Wangchuk's detention?
Sonam Wangchuk was detained under the National Security Act due to allegations of inciting violence during protests in Leh.
Who filed the petition against his detention?
The petition challenging his detention was filed by Gitanjali J. Angmo, Sonam Wangchuk's wife.
What did the Supreme Court order regarding medical attention for Wangchuk?
The Court ordered that Sonam Wangchuk be provided with any necessary medical attention as per existing prison regulations.
What is the next step in the legal proceedings?
The matter is scheduled for a hearing next Tuesday, where further details will be discussed.
What are the implications of this case?
This case raises significant questions about the intersection of activism, national security, and individual rights in India.
Nation Press