Will the Supreme Court Protect a Kerala Karate Instructor from Arrest in a POCSO Case?
Synopsis
Key Takeaways
- Supreme Court grants interim protection from arrest to the Kerala karate instructor.
- SLP challenges the Kerala High Court's dismissal of anticipatory bail.
- Complainant's motivations questioned due to the timing of the allegations.
- Impact of criminal accusations on educators emphasized.
- Next hearing scheduled for February 2026.
New Delhi, Dec 13 (NationPress) The Supreme Court has ruled that no coercive measures should be initiated against a karate instructor from Kerala who is facing allegations under the Indian Penal Code and the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences (POCSO) Act.
In response to his special leave petition (SLP) contesting the denial of anticipatory bail, a Bench comprising Justices Sanjay Kumar and Alok Aradhe requested feedback from both the state of Kerala and the complainant.
Scheduling the notice to be returnable on February 18, 2026, the apex court has provided temporary protection from arrest for the petitioner.
The court stated, "Provided that the petitioner, Sunil Kumar, participates and cooperates with the investigation... he will not face arrest until the next hearing."
This interim relief is contingent upon the First Information Report (FIR) lodged at the Vadakara Police Station in Kozhikode Rural district for offenses under Sections 354A(1)(i), 354B, and 354D of the IPC, along with Sections 9(l), 10, and 9(o) of the POCSO Act.
The Justice Kumar-led Bench further instructed the petitioner to adhere strictly to the stipulations outlined in Section 482(2) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023.
The SLP, submitted by advocate Vipin Nair, challenged the Kerala High Court's ruling dated November 4, 2025, which had rejected the anticipatory bail request, asserting that a prima facie case existed against him.
The 46-year-old karate instructor, who serves as the National Secretary of Kenyuryu Karate India, claims that the POCSO provisions have been misused due to a "motivated and belated" complaint from a former student. He argues that the complaint was lodged nearly five years after the alleged incidents, which took place between 2018 and 2020.
Additionally, the SLP points out that despite the timeframe of the alleged events, the complainant maintained a friendly relationship with the petitioner and even praised him publicly in 2022, referring to him as a "father figure."
It further contends that professional rivalry and personal animosity emerged after the complainant departed from the petitioner’s karate center to join a competing club. Citing previous Supreme Court judgments regarding the detrimental impact of criminal allegations on educators' reputations, the petitioner asserted that custodial interrogation was unwarranted due to his cooperation with the investigation and lack of a criminal background.