Did the SC Stay the Delhi HC Ruling on NCISM Chairperson's Appointment?
Click to start listening
Synopsis
In a significant legal development, the <b>Supreme Court</b> has temporarily suspended the <b>Delhi High Court's</b> decision that invalidated <b>Dr. Vaidya Jayant Deopujari's</b> appointment as the <b>NCISM Chairperson</b>. This ruling raises critical questions about qualifications required for such pivotal roles in the Indian healthcare system.
Key Takeaways
- Supreme Court stays Delhi HC ruling.
- Dr. Deopujari's qualifications questioned.
- Legal standards for NCISM Chairperson emphasized.
- Ph.D. vs. postgraduate degree debate.
- Impact on Indian healthcare leadership.
New Delhi, June 10 (NationPress) The Supreme Court has issued an interim order, halting the enforcement of a ruling from the Delhi High Court that annulled the appointment of Dr. Vaidya Jayant Deopujari as the Chairperson of the National Commission for Indian System of Medicine (NCISM).
A panel of Justices Prashant Kumar Mishra and Manmohan has agreed to review the Special Leave Petition (SLP) submitted by the NCISM and has issued notices to Dr. Ved Prakash Tyagi and Dr. Raghunandan Sharma, the initial petitioners in the case, along with others involved.
In a ruling delivered on June 6, the Delhi High Court determined that Dr. Deopujari's appointment contradicted legal requirements, as he lacked the qualifications stipulated under Section 4(2) of the NCISM Act, 2020.
The law mandates that a candidate for the NCISM Chairperson role must demonstrate outstanding ability, proven administrative skills, and integrity. Additionally, they must hold a postgraduate degree in any discipline of the Indian system of medicine from an accredited university and possess a minimum of 20 years of experience in the field, including at least 10 years in a leadership role within healthcare delivery and the development of the Indian medical system.
The panel, led by Chief Justice D.K. Upadhyay and Justice Tushar Rao Gedela, noted that while Dr. Deopujari possesses a Ph.D., which is a higher qualification than a postgraduate degree, it does not satisfy the statutory requirement of having a postgraduate qualification.
“In assessing the term ‘Post-Graduate Degree’ in Section 4(2) of the NCISM Act, 2020, we believe it refers to a degree earned after completing a specific course of study post-graduation. A Ph.D. is considered a research qualification, not an educational one,” the Delhi High Court ruled.
Moreover, the Delhi High Court rejected the Union government's argument that Dr. Deopujari met the eligibility criteria due to his experience as head of the R&D and F&D departments at a drug manufacturing company in Nagpur for over 11 years.
It stated, “We disagree with the assertion that this experience qualifies as leadership experience in the capacity of ‘Head of a Department’ or ‘Head of an Organisation’.”
Following the stay order on the Delhi High Court's verdict, the apex court indicated that it would assess whether a Ph.D. degree could be regarded as equivalent to the legally mandated qualification of a postgraduate degree.
Point of View
I believe this decision underscores the importance of adhering to legal qualifications in healthcare leadership. Ensuring that our leaders possess the requisite expertise and experience is crucial for maintaining integrity and credibility in the field of Indian medicine. This ruling serves as a reminder of the standards we must uphold in public service.
NationPress
11/06/2025
Frequently Asked Questions
What was the Supreme Court's recent decision regarding NCISM?
The Supreme Court issued an interim order staying the Delhi High Court's ruling that annulled the appointment of Dr. Vaidya Jayant Deopujari as the NCISM Chairperson.
Why did the Delhi High Court annul Dr. Deopujari's appointment?
The Delhi High Court ruled that Dr. Deopujari did not meet the qualifications mandated by the NCISM Act, 2020, particularly lacking a postgraduate degree.
What qualifications are required for the NCISM Chairperson?
Candidates must have a postgraduate degree in Indian medicine, along with at least 20 years of experience, including 10 years in a leadership role.
What is the significance of the Supreme Court's stay order?
The stay order allows for further examination of whether a Ph.D. can be considered equivalent to the required postgraduate degree for the NCISM Chairperson position.
How does this ruling impact the Indian healthcare system?
This ruling emphasizes the importance of adhering to legal qualifications in healthcare leadership, ensuring that appointed individuals possess the necessary credentials.
