What Actions Will SCBA Take Against Advocate Who Tried to Attack CJI Gavai?
Click to start listening
Synopsis
The SCBA is in shock after an advocate attempted to assault CJI B.R. Gavai inside the Supreme Court. This incident raises questions about judicial decorum and public trust in the justice system. The SCBA considers disciplinary actions against the advocate while CJI Gavai emphasizes respect for all religions amidst growing tensions.
Key Takeaways
- The SCBA expressed strong condemnation of the advocate's actions.
- Disciplinary measures against the advocate are being considered.
- CJI Gavai emphasized the need for respect in the judiciary.
- The incident raises concerns about public trust in the justice system.
- Calmness in the face of provocation was highlighted by CJI Gavai.
New Delhi, Oct 6 (NationPress) The Supreme Court Bar Association (SCBA) on Monday expressed deep shock, outrage, and strong condemnation regarding the incident where an advocate attempted to assault Chief Justice of India (CJI) B.R. Gavai within the Supreme Court premises. The association is currently contemplating suitable disciplinary measures against the involved temporary member.
Reports indicate that the individual, dressed in legal attire, approached the dais of the CJI Gavai-led Bench and allegedly tried to remove his shoe. Security personnel quickly intervened and escorted him out of the courtroom.
During his removal, the advocate was heard chanting slogans related to Sanatan Dharma. This incident reportedly stemmed from CJI Gavai's comments on the Khajuraho Vishnu Idol Restoration case.
Subsequently, CJI Gavai underscored the importance of respecting all religions and addressed misinformation circulating on social media.
"Someone informed me recently that my comments have been misrepresented on social media. I hold deep respect for all religions," clarified CJI Gavai on September 18.
The SCBA described the advocate's actions as a direct assault on judicial independence, which erodes public trust in the justice system.
“This behavior undermines the fundamental respect that sustains the relationship between the Bench and the Bar. It violates constitutional values of decorum and discipline and diminishes public confidence in the justice delivery system,” asserted the SCBA.
The resolution praised the calm demeanor and remarkable restraint exhibited by CJI Gavai, who continued to fulfill his duties “with dignity and poise” in light of the serious provocation. The bar association noted that the advocate involved is a temporary member and is considering disciplinary action against him.
“The SCBA also acknowledges that the advocate involved in this incident is a temporary member of the Association. The SCBA is considering appropriate disciplinary action against him,” it stated.
In the meantime, CJI Gavai reportedly chose not to pursue any action against the advocate and suggested that the incident should be overlooked.
“Do not let this distract you. We remain focused. Such events do not affect me,” he stated in open court.
Earlier, the Supreme Court Advocates-on-Record Association (SCAORA) called for the apex court to take suo motu cognizance of the incident and initiate appropriate contempt proceedings.
Point of View
It is crucial to emphasize the importance of maintaining decorum within our judicial system. The incident involving CJI Gavai is alarming and should serve as a wake-up call for all members of the legal community. It is essential that we uphold the values of respect and discipline that underpin our justice system.
NationPress
06/10/2025
Frequently Asked Questions
What happened during the incident involving CJI Gavai?
An advocate attempted to attack CJI B.R. Gavai inside the Supreme Court, which led to immediate intervention by security personnel.
What actions is the SCBA considering?
The SCBA is contemplating disciplinary actions against the temporary member involved in the incident.
How did CJI Gavai respond to the incident?
CJI Gavai maintained his composure and emphasized the importance of respect for all religions, stating that such incidents should not distract from judicial duties.
