SCBA condemns assault on advocate Pankaj Sharma, demands Delhi Police probe

Share:
Audio Loading voice…
SCBA condemns assault on advocate Pankaj Sharma, demands Delhi Police probe

Synopsis

The Supreme Court Bar Association has formally condemned the alleged assault on advocate Pankaj Sharma by his neighbour on 11 July, flagging a troubling gap: the FIR reportedly omits charges for grievous injury and an alleged attempt on his life. The SCBA's demand for the Delhi Police Commissioner to personally intervene raises the stakes well beyond one lawyer's case — it is a direct challenge to how law enforcement treats the legal fraternity.

Key Takeaways

The Supreme Court Bar Association (SCBA) passed a formal resolution on 13 July condemning the alleged assault on advocate Pankaj Sharma .
Sharma was allegedly attacked at his New Delhi residence by his neighbour on 11 July , sustaining serious injuries.
The SCBA alleged the FIR failed to reflect charges for grievous injuries or the alleged attempt on Sharma's life.
The Bar body demanded the Delhi Police Commissioner review the probe and ensure all disclosed offences are investigated.
Immediate police protection for Sharma and his family was also demanded, so they can pursue legal remedies without fear or intimidation.

The Supreme Court Bar Association (SCBA) on Monday, 13 July strongly condemned the alleged brutal assault on advocate Pankaj Sharma, a senior member of the Bar, calling it a direct attack on the institution of justice and raising serious concerns about the adequacy of the police investigation. The Bar body's Executive Committee passed a formal resolution demanding immediate intervention by the Delhi Police Commissioner.

What Happened

Sharma was allegedly attacked at his New Delhi residence by his neighbour on 11 July, sustaining serious injuries. The SCBA's resolution noted that despite the gravity of the incident, the First Information Report (FIR) reportedly failed to incorporate charges relating to the grievous injuries inflicted on Sharma or the alleged attempt on his life. The Bar association further alleged that repeated complaints had yielded no effective police action and that neither Sharma nor his family had been provided meaningful protection.

SCBA's Key Concerns

The Executive Committee's resolution stated it was 'deeply disturbed' that an advocate of the Supreme Court of India could be 'left vulnerable to violence, intimidation and continued threats without adequate protection from the law enforcement authorities.' The SCBA stressed that such incidents 'strike at the very foundation of the rule of law and undermine public confidence in the administration of justice.'

The association also drew a broader implication: 'If an Advocate of the Supreme Court of India can be subjected to a brutal physical assault, followed by continued threats and intimidation to his family, without adequate protection or prompt and effective police action, it raises serious concerns about the ability of ordinary citizens to secure the protection of law,' the resolution read.

Demands Placed Before Delhi Police

The SCBA urged the Delhi Police Commissioner to review the ongoing investigation and ensure that all offences disclosed by the facts and available medical evidence are duly investigated. It called for prompt legal action against every person allegedly involved in the assault, criminal intimidation, and any subsequent interference with the probe. The Bar body also demanded immediate and adequate police protection for Sharma and every member of his family so they could pursue legal remedies 'without fear, intimidation or coercion.'

SCBA's Stand

'The SCBA firmly stands with Mr. Sharma and is going to support him in dealing with this heinous attack,' the resolution declared. The association underscored that 'an attack on an advocate is not merely an attack on an individual; it is an attack on the institution of justice itself.' The SCBA's intervention signals that the country's apex Bar body views the case as a test of the legal fraternity's security and the state's commitment to upholding the rule of law.

With the resolution now formally on record, all eyes turn to the Delhi Police and whether the investigation will be strengthened to reflect the seriousness of the alleged offences.

Point of View

That is a serious procedural lapse, not a minor oversight. The broader concern the resolution raises — that ordinary citizens fare even worse when the legal system fails one of its own — is the more uncomfortable question that Delhi Police must now answer publicly.
NationPress
13 Jul 2026

Frequently Asked Questions

Who is advocate Pankaj Sharma and what happened to him?
Pankaj Sharma is a senior advocate and member of the Supreme Court Bar. He was allegedly attacked at his New Delhi residence by his neighbour on 11 July, sustaining serious injuries, according to the SCBA's resolution.
What action has the SCBA demanded from Delhi Police?
The SCBA has urged the Delhi Police Commissioner to review the investigation, ensure all offences supported by facts and medical evidence are properly investigated, take action against all persons allegedly involved, and provide immediate police protection to Sharma and his family.
What is the SCBA's concern about the FIR filed in this case?
The SCBA alleged that the FIR does not appear to include charges related to the grievous injuries sustained by Sharma or the alleged attempt on his life, despite the seriousness of the incident. It termed this a failure to adequately reflect the gravity of the assault.
Why does the SCBA say an attack on a lawyer is an attack on justice?
The SCBA's resolution states that an attack on an advocate is not merely an attack on an individual but on the institution of justice itself, since lawyers are officers of the court whose ability to function without fear is fundamental to the rule of law.
What broader concern has the SCBA raised about law and order?
The SCBA warned that if a Supreme Court advocate can face a brutal assault followed by continued threats without adequate police protection, it raises serious questions about the ability of ordinary citizens to secure the protection of law — a concern that goes beyond this individual case.
Nation Press
The Trail

Connected Dots

Tracing the thread behind this story — newest first.

8 Dots
  1. Latest 1 month ago
  2. 2 months ago
  3. 2 months ago
  4. 2 months ago
  5. 9 months ago
  6. 9 months ago
  7. 10 months ago
  8. 1 year ago
Google Prefer NP
On Google