Was Seetha's Death a Murder Instead of an Elephant Attack?
Click to start listening
Synopsis
The tragic death of Seetha in Kerala’s Peerumade forest is now suspected to be a murder rather than an elephant attack. An autopsy revealed serious injuries inconsistent with wildlife involvement. As authorities investigate, her husband Binu faces scrutiny for potential foul play. What really happened in the forest that day?
Key Takeaways
- Seetha's death is now classified as a potential murder.
- The autopsy revealed serious injuries inconsistent with wildlife attacks.
- Binu's initial account was filled with inconsistencies.
- Police are actively investigating the circumstances of her death.
- Forest officials had doubts about the legitimacy of the elephant attack claim.
Idukki (Kerala), June 14 (NationPress) In a startling development that alters the narrative of what was first described as a tragic wildlife incident, the death of 42-year-old Seetha in the Peerumade forest region of Kerala is now being investigated as a potential murder, rather than an elephant attack as her husband, Binu, initially claimed, according to the recently released autopsy report.
Seetha’s lifeless body was discovered on Friday, and Binu, who serves as a temporary fire watcher with the forest department, had informed authorities that she was crushed by a wild elephant while they were gathering forest resources.
Nonetheless, the autopsy findings, made public on Saturday, indicated significant injuries to her head and numerous fractures on both sides of her ribs—injuries that do not align with the effects of an elephant attack.
In light of these revelations, police have taken Binu into custody for further questioning.
Sources revealed that he had been under scrutiny since his version of the incident contained numerous discrepancies and gaps.
Forest personnel, who were among the first responders, had already expressed skepticism. They noted that Seetha’s injuries did not match typical wounds caused by elephants.
One official remarked, “The type of trauma on her body raised immediate concerns. It appeared more indicative of blunt force trauma than trampling.”
Initially, Binu stated that the entire family, including their two young children, had entered the forest together. However, during police questioning, the children disclosed that only Seetha and Binu had gone into the forest early that morning, with the children following much later.
Given Binu’s familiarity with the forest and elephant behaviors, officials suspect he may have attempted to fabricate a wildlife narrative to conceal a potential crime.
Police continue to interrogate Binu and have initiated a comprehensive investigation into the events surrounding Seetha’s death.
Point of View
We remain dedicated to revealing the facts surrounding Seetha's death. The discrepancies in her husband's account raise critical questions. It's essential we approach this case with thorough investigation and transparency, ensuring justice is served while respecting the memory of Seetha.
NationPress
15/06/2025
Frequently Asked Questions
What caused Seetha's death?
Seetha's death was initially reported as an elephant attack, but the autopsy indicated severe injuries suggesting a possible murder.
Why is her husband under investigation?
Binu's account of the incident contained inconsistencies, leading authorities to question his involvement in Seetha's death.
What did the autopsy reveal?
The autopsy report showed significant head injuries and multiple rib fractures, which are not typical of injuries caused by an elephant.
What are the next steps in the investigation?
Police are continuing to interrogate Binu and have launched a detailed inquiry into the circumstances surrounding Seetha's death.
How did forest officials react to the report?
Forest officials expressed skepticism about the elephant attack claim, citing the nature of Seetha's injuries as suspicious.
