Shiv Sena(UBT) tells Fadnavis: Tax contractors, not citizens, for drought aid

Share:
Audio Loading voice…
Shiv Sena(UBT) tells Fadnavis: Tax contractors, not citizens, for drought aid

Synopsis

With four farmers reportedly dead by suicide in two days across Maharashtra, Shiv Sena (UBT) is refusing to let CM Fadnavis off the hook with a citizen-donation appeal. The party's Saamana editorial names specific targets — contractor kickbacks, Konkan land deals, Shaktipeeth Expressway funds — and demands ₹2,000–4,000 crore from PM CARES. It is a pointed, numbers-backed political indictment, not just rhetoric.

Key Takeaways

Shiv Sena (UBT) attacked CM Devendra Fadnavis in its mouthpiece Saamana on 29 September over his appeal for citizens to donate savings toward drought relief.
Four farmers reportedly died by suicide in two days across Parbhani , Yavatmal , Solapur , and Hingoli districts amid severe drought conditions.
The editorial alleged financial irregularities in Konkan coastal land sales and the Shaktipeeth Expressway , calling the government a 'government of commission-agents and contractors.' The party proposed mandatory contributions from Mumbai builders and SRA developers , and demanded ₹2,000 crore to ₹4,000 crore from the PM CARES Fund for Maharashtra's farmers.
Shiv Sena (UBT) dismissed ministerial salary donations as symbolic, urging the government to target 11 crore citizens' interests by dismantling contractor-political middlemen networks.

Shiv Sena (UBT) on Tuesday, 29 September launched a blistering attack on Maharashtra Chief Minister Devendra Fadnavis over his appeal asking ordinary citizens to cut back on personal celebrations and donate savings toward drought relief, calling the approach 'picking pennies from empty pockets.' The Thackeray-led party, writing in its mouthpiece 'Saamana', argued that the state has far more potent — and more just — sources of relief funding that it is refusing to tap.

Farmer Deaths Sharpen the Urgency

The editorial grounded its critique in an escalating human cost. According to the party's editorial, four farmers died by suicide within two days across the districts of Parbhani, Yavatmal, Solapur, and Hingoli — all driven, reportedly, by drought-induced debt and financial despair. Shiv Sena (UBT) warned that without direct and immediate state intervention, drought-affected regions risk becoming, in its words, 'graveyards,' placing the moral and administrative burden squarely on Chief Minister Fadnavis and his government.

The Corruption Argument: Where the Money Really Is

Rather than asking citizens already strained by inflation to forgo weddings and naming ceremonies, the editorial urged the government to turn its attention inward. It alleged widespread financial irregularities in state infrastructure projects, citing specifically the Konkan coastal land sales and the flow of public funds around the Shaktipeeth Expressway as examples of systemic leakage. 'The state government has become a government of commission-agents and contractors. There is looting everywhere. Inventing unnecessary projects to divert the treasury to contractors and warm one's own pockets — even if the Chief Minister stops this loot, it will benefit the drought-affected,' the editorial stated.

Specific Funding Proposals from Saamana

The editorial went beyond criticism to outline concrete alternative funding mechanisms. It called on the government to redirect pending political ally instalments directly into drought relief accounts and to mandate contributions from major Mumbai builders, Slum Rehabilitation Authority (SRA) developers, and senior bureaucrats. It also proposed that the Centre allocate between ₹2,000 crore and ₹4,000 crore from the unutilised balance of the PM CARES Fund specifically to support Maharashtra's agricultural sector.

Political Spending in the Crosshairs

The Thackeray camp also took aim at alleged horse-trading and political defection funding, arguing that money reportedly set aside for electioneering and political poaching should be diverted immediately to rural distress. Symbolic gestures by ministers — such as donating a single month's salary — were dismissed as inadequate given the scale of resources the ruling alliance reportedly controls.

What Shiv Sena (UBT) Is Demanding

In conclusion, the party urged Chief Minister Fadnavis to demonstrate political courage by dismantling what it described as a 'thriving nexus of corrupt officials, contractors, and political middlemen,' and channelling those recovered funds toward genuine relief for the state's 11 crore citizens. This comes amid a broader opposition push in Maharashtra to hold the ruling Mahayuti alliance accountable for agrarian distress ahead of a politically sensitive period in the state.

Point of View

Shiv Sena (UBT) makes the drought a human story rather than a budget dispute, which is harder for the government to deflect. The demand to tap PM CARES Fund is a calculated political move: it draws the Centre into a state-level crisis and puts the BJP in an awkward position. What the editorial does not address is whether Shiv Sena (UBT), during its own stint in power, made measurably different choices on contractor accountability — a gap the ruling alliance will almost certainly exploit. The deeper issue Maharashtra's agrarian crisis keeps exposing is the absence of a permanent, transparent drought-financing mechanism that does not depend on the political will of whoever is in power.
NationPress
29 Sept 2026

Frequently Asked Questions

Why did Shiv Sena (UBT) criticise CM Fadnavis over drought relief?
Shiv Sena (UBT) objected to Chief Minister Devendra Fadnavis's appeal asking citizens to cut personal celebrations and donate savings for drought relief, calling it 'picking pennies from empty pockets.' The party argued that the government should instead recover funds lost to contractor corruption and political kickbacks, rather than burdening an inflation-hit public.
How many farmer suicides have been reported in Maharashtra's drought-hit districts?
According to the Saamana editorial, four farmers died by suicide within a span of two days across the districts of Parbhani, Yavatmal, Solapur, and Hingoli, reportedly due to drought-induced debt and financial hardship. Shiv Sena (UBT) cited these deaths to underscore the urgency of direct state intervention.
What alternative funding sources did Shiv Sena (UBT) propose for drought relief?
The party proposed several measures: cracking down on contractor kickbacks and corruption in projects like the Shaktipeeth Expressway and Konkan coastal land deals, mandating contributions from Mumbai builders and SRA developers, and requesting an allocation of ₹2,000 crore to ₹4,000 crore from the PM CARES Fund for Maharashtra's agricultural sector.
What did the Saamana editorial say about ministerial salary donations?
The editorial dismissed symbolic gestures such as ministers donating a single month's salary as inadequate and hollow, given the vast resources reportedly controlled by ruling politicians. It urged the leadership to instead dismantle the nexus of corrupt officials, contractors, and political middlemen to generate meaningful relief.
What is the significance of the PM CARES Fund demand by Shiv Sena (UBT)?
By calling for ₹2,000–4,000 crore from the PM CARES Fund, Shiv Sena (UBT) is drawing the Central government into what has primarily been a state-level drought debate. The fund, managed at the Centre, has faced scrutiny over its utilisation, and the demand puts both the Maharashtra government and the BJP-led Centre on the defensive over drought accountability.
Nation Press
The Trail

Connected Dots

Tracing the thread behind this story — newest first.

8 Dots
  1. Latest 1 week ago
  2. 2 months ago
  3. 3 months ago
  4. 5 months ago
  5. 9 months ago
  6. 11 months ago
  7. 1 year ago
  8. 1 year ago
Google Prefer NP
On Google