Madras HC hears Senthil Balaji's anticipatory bail plea in ₹35 crore bribery case
Synopsis
Key Takeaways
The Madras High Court is scheduled to hear the anticipatory bail plea of former Tamil Nadu minister V. Senthil Balaji on Wednesday, 8 July, in connection with an alleged ₹35 crore horse-trading case involving an attempt to influence a Tamilaga Vettri Kazhagam (TVK) legislator. Senthil Balaji has sought court protection from arrest, contending that he has been falsely implicated for political reasons and that no credible evidence links him to the alleged conspiracy.
What the Case Alleges
The case centres on allegations that TVK MLA N. Elaiyaraja was offered ₹35 crore to vote in favour of a proposed no-confidence motion against the Speaker of the Tamil Nadu Legislative Assembly. Following a complaint, the Triplicane police arrested eight persons, including one Thirunavukkarasu, who is alleged to have acted as an intermediary in the horse-trading operation.
Senthil Balaji's Position
In his petition, Senthil Balaji argued that he had no connection whatsoever with the alleged attempt to influence the TVK legislator. He maintained that the case was registered with political malice and that there is no material evidence to justify his arrest. He has requested the court to grant anticipatory bail while the investigation continues.
Brother's Plea Also Listed
Senthil Balaji's younger brother, Ashok Kumar, has separately approached the Madras High Court seeking anticipatory bail. His plea is also scheduled to be heard on Wednesday before Justice G.K. Ilanthiraiyan, who handles cases involving Members of Parliament and Members of the Legislative Assembly. According to police, investigators had issued summonses directing both Senthil Balaji and Ashok Kumar to appear for questioning, but neither reportedly appeared before the investigating officers.
Political Sensitivity and What Comes Next
The horse-trading case has emerged as a politically charged investigation in Tamil Nadu, with police probing alleged attempts to influence the voting of elected representatives. The High Court's ruling on both anticipatory bail pleas is expected to significantly shape the trajectory of the investigation. A grant of bail could limit investigators' ability to conduct custodial questioning, while a rejection would expose both men to potential arrest.