SIR is legitimate, Opposition free to protest within rules: BJP leaders
Synopsis
Key Takeaways
Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) leaders in Bihar on Thursday, 8 October 2026, defended the Special Intensive Revision (SIR) of electoral rolls as a constitutionally valid exercise, even as they acknowledged the Opposition's right to protest and seek a presidential audience — provided established procedures are followed. The remarks came amid a growing political controversy over the Election Commission's ongoing SIR drive.
BJP's Defence of the SIR Process
BJP Bihar President Sanjay Saraogi stated that the SIR is fully within the rights of the Election Commission and serves a necessary housekeeping function for the electoral rolls. 'They should meet anyone they want to. It is their constitutional right. Anyone can meet the President as per the procedure and rules if the President grants permission. But the issue on which they want to meet is not an issue at all,' Saraogi said. He added that the revision is aimed at removing the names of deceased persons, those with duplicate entries, people who have permanently relocated, and — as he alleged — 'Bangladeshis and Rohingyas.'
Bihar Minister Dilip Jaiswal put it in simpler terms: 'If a voter has died, should their name not be removed? There are only three things. The name of a deceased voter should be removed. If a voter's name appears in two places, it should be removed from one place. And if a voter has given an address saying they live in a particular locality, but when officials go there, they are told that no person by that name has lived there for 20 years, their name should be removed. That is what SIR is.'
Sharp Words for Rahul Gandhi
Jaiswal did not limit his remarks to the SIR's mechanics. Targeting Congress leader Rahul Gandhi by name, he said, 'Rahul Gandhi understands neither Hindi nor English. This is the restlessness for power. In the desperation for power, a person becomes ready to do anything.' The remarks signal that the BJP intends to frame Opposition objections as politically motivated rather than procedurally grounded.
Election Commission Backed, Opposition Urged to Follow Rules
Bihar Minister Ram Kripal Yadav vouched for Chief Election Commissioner Gyanesh Kumar, saying he 'discharged his responsibilities and conducted the elections… establishing democracy without coming under anyone's influence.' The comment appeared to be a pointed rebuttal of Opposition suggestions that the SIR process could be used to selectively disenfranchise voters.
BJP MP Ashok Mittal took a more measured line: 'In a democracy, everyone has the freedom to express their views and register their protest. But there are rules for that. I would only urge the Leader of the Opposition to conduct the protest according to the rules, express his opposition and put forward his views.'
Background and What's at Stake
The SIR has become a flashpoint ahead of upcoming state elections, with Opposition parties alleging that the revision exercise could result in the deletion of valid voter names — particularly from marginalised communities. The BJP's coordinated defence on Thursday suggests the party is bracing for a sustained political battle over the issue. Notably, the Opposition's reported plan to meet President Droupadi Murmu over the matter has drawn both acknowledgement and dismissal from BJP ranks — accepted as a constitutional right, but rejected as a substantive grievance. How the Election Commission responds to Opposition pressure, and whether any judicial challenge to the SIR materialises, will shape the next phase of this controversy.