Bihar CM Samrat Choudhary slams Opposition over SIR: 'Back claims with facts'
Synopsis
Key Takeaways
Bihar Chief Minister Samrat Choudhary on 27 September 2026 sharply rebuked the Opposition over its allegations against the Election Commission of India's Special Intensive Revision (SIR) exercise, demanding that parties substantiate their claims with concrete facts and documents rather than making what he called baseless accusations. The statement came in Patna amid mounting political pressure from opposition leaders over the voter list revision process.
What the Chief Minister Said
Choudhary emphasised that the SIR is not a novel mechanism introduced for the first time in Bihar. He pointed out that a similar exercise was conducted in 2003, and the 2025 revision was built upon the foundation of the existing electoral roll rather than starting from scratch. He urged the Opposition not to trivialise a legally established process through political rhetoric.
The Chief Minister further explained that during the SIR, Booth Level Officers (BLOs) conducted door-to-door outreach across constituencies. The Election Commission of India (ECI) subsequently released draft electoral rolls, opening a formal window for claims and objections before the final list was published — a standard procedural safeguard.
Response to Rahul Gandhi and Tejashwi Yadav
Addressing specific concerns raised by Congress leader Rahul Gandhi and Rashtriya Janata Dal (RJD) leader Tejashwi Yadav regarding names removed from voter lists, Choudhary stated that objections could have been formally lodged with the Election Commission, supported by documentation. He added that any discrepancies identified during the process were rectified through established procedures.
On the Opposition's demand to cancel the elections, the Chief Minister was unequivocal: mechanisms exist through the Election Commission and the courts for anyone with genuine grievances about electoral irregularities. He asserted that while raising questions about the electoral process is a democratic right, those questions must be grounded in verifiable facts rather than political allegation.
On Voter List Deletions
Choudhary noted that BLOs identified and removed a large number of voters who were deceased, had permanently relocated, or were registered at multiple locations. He argued this was not suppression of voters but a legitimate cleansing of the rolls to reflect ground realities, consistent with established electoral norms.
On the Opposition's Planned Agitation
While supporting parties' democratic right to protest and demonstrate, Choudhary maintained that the SIR has already been completed in Bihar and that questions surrounding the process have been addressed at the appropriate levels. He reiterated that the public holds the ultimate authority in elections, and political parties must respect the people's verdict. The ECI's draft roll publication and objection window, he argued, provided adequate opportunity for all parties to flag discrepancies before the final list was sealed.