CM Sukhu: My assets have decreased since taking office
Synopsis
Key Takeaways
In a pointed rebuttal to the opposition, Himachal Pradesh Chief Minister Sukhvinder Singh Sukhu declared on Wednesday, 29 July 2026 that his personal wealth has actually shrunk since he assumed office — and challenged the Bharatiya Janata Party to take its doubts straight to the Enforcement Directorate and the Central Bureau of Investigation.
Posting in Hindi on X, CM Sukhu said: 'My assets have decreased since becoming Chief Minister. The complete details will also be recorded in the upcoming election affidavit. Providing correct and complete information about one's assets during elections is mandatory, so no incorrect information can be given in it. My election affidavits have been public earlier too and have been scrutinised. My assets are already declared. There is no new asset in this. Anyone can earn money through hard work and honesty. If the BJP has any doubt about my assets, it can get the information from the ED and CBI.'
The affidavit guarantee — and why it matters
Sukhu's defence rests on a legal architecture that has governed Indian elections for over two decades. Following the Supreme Court's landmark 2002 judgment in Union of India v. Association for Democratic Reforms and subsequent Election Commission orders from 2003 onward, every candidate contesting an election must file a sworn affidavit disclosing assets, liabilities, and criminal antecedents. Perjury on that form carries serious legal consequences — which is precisely the guarantee Sukhu is invoking.
His point is blunt: the next affidavit, expected ahead of the 2027 Himachal Pradesh assembly elections, will be a public, legally binding document. If numbers don't add up, anyone can challenge them. He is, in effect, daring the opposition to wait and watch.
BJP allegations and the ED-CBI dare
Himachal Pradesh politics has long run on this cycle — whichever party sits in opposition routinely raises asset-growth allegations against the ruling chief minister, and the ruling side points back to public disclosures. What sharpens Sukhu's response this time is the explicit redirect to central investigative agencies. By naming the ED and CBI himself, he pre-empts any suggestion that he fears a probe, flipping the political pressure back onto the BJP.
The exact figures of his asset position — both before and after taking office in December 2022 — have not been independently verified, and Sukhu himself has not cited specific numbers in this post. The full picture will only emerge when the next election affidavit is formally filed.
Until that document lands, Sukhu has done what seasoned politicians do when cornered by asset questions: he pointed to the one instrument the law requires him to be honest about — and told his critics to read it.