Anurag Thakur Hits Out at Opposition Over Poll Body Attacks

Share:
Audio Loading voice…
Anurag Thakur Hits Out at Opposition Over Poll Body Attacks

Synopsis

BJP MP Anurag Thakur, posting from Dharamshala on September 26, accused the Congress-led opposition of making baseless allegations against EVMs, electoral rolls and the Election Commission instead of reflecting on their own electoral failures.

Key Takeaways

Anurag Thakur , BJP Lok Sabha MP from Hamirpur, Himachal Pradesh , posted from Dharamshala on September 26, 2026 .
He accused the opposition of targeting EVMs , the Special Summary Revision (SIR) of electoral rolls, and the Election Commission of India with what he called 'baseless allegations'.
Thakur argued the opposition seeks scapegoats rather than engaging in introspection after electoral defeats.
Congress and allied parties have raised EVM and Election Commission concerns repeatedly since the 2019 Lok Sabha results .
The Election Commission has consistently cited established verification protocols in response to such allegations.

From Dharamshala, BJP MP Anurag Thakur fired a pointed broadside at the opposition on Saturday, September 26, 2026 — accusing Congress and its allies of weaponising every election loss into a fresh round of 'baseless allegations' against the very institutions that run India's democracy.

In a post that cuts to the heart of a recurring political pattern, Thakur wrote: 'विपक्ष आत्मचिंतन की बजाय अपनी नाकामी का ठीकरा किसी और के सर पर फोड़ने का बस बहाना ढूंढता है' — ('Instead of introspection, the opposition simply looks for excuses to pin the blame for its own failures on someone else'). His targets: the familiar post-defeat trilogy of Electronic Voting Machines (EVMs), the Special Summary Revision (SIR) of electoral rolls, and the Election Commission of India itself — including its commissioners.

A Familiar Playbook After Every Electoral Setback

The charge Thakur levels is not new — but its persistence says something telling about Indian electoral politics. Each time a major verdict goes against the opposition, a predictable sequence follows: questions about EVM tampering, concerns about voter-roll manipulation, and allegations of bias within the Election Commission. The Commission has consistently cited its established verification protocols in response.

Congress and allied parties began raising EVM reliability concerns with particular force after the 2019 Lok Sabha results, a pattern that has continued through successive state assembly polls. The argument from the opposition: the machines are opaque and unverifiable. The counter from the Commission and the ruling party: the machines have survived multiple legal challenges and independent audits.

Thakur's Message from Dharamshala

The BJP MP's choice of Dharamshala as his dateline is significant — the hill town is both a political nerve centre of Himachal Pradesh and the home turf of a state where electoral fortunes have historically swung hard. Speaking from within his own region, Thakur framed the opposition's allegations not merely as political noise but as a deliberate effort to 'confuse the public' — 'जनता को भ्रमित करने के लिए बेबुनियाद आरोप लगाता है' ('levelling baseless allegations to mislead the public').

The political signal is clear: BJP intends to push back hard against any narrative that questions institutional credibility, casting the opposition's critique as deflection from organisational failure rather than legitimate constitutional concern.

Whether the Election Commission responds formally — or whether the argument finds its way into the next parliamentary session — will determine how far this particular volley travels.

Point of View

Not principled democratic concern. The pattern — defeat followed by institutional critique — has become so predictable that BJP now treats it as a vulnerability for the opposition, not a credible challenge. At the same time, the opposition's persistence on EVM and Election Commission integrity reflects a genuine crisis of institutional trust among a section of the electorate that is not easily dismissed. The real stakes here are long-term: repeated attacks on the Commission's credibility, whether justified or not, erode public confidence in the electoral process itself — a cost both sides bear.
NationPress
26 Sept 2026

Frequently Asked Questions

What did Anurag Thakur say about the opposition and EVMs?
Anurag Thakur accused the Congress-led opposition of levelling baseless allegations against EVMs, electoral rolls and the Election Commission to distract from their own electoral failures, rather than engaging in genuine introspection.
What is SIR in the context of Indian elections?
SIR stands for Special Summary Revision, a periodic process conducted by the Election Commission of India to update and correct electoral rolls before elections. Opposition parties have at times alleged irregularities in this process.
Why do opposition parties allege EVM tampering in India?
Opposition parties have questioned EVM reliability, particularly after significant electoral defeats such as the 2019 Lok Sabha results, arguing the machines lack transparency. The Election Commission has defended EVMs citing multiple legal challenges and verification protocols that have consistently upheld their integrity.
Where did Anurag Thakur make this statement?
Anurag Thakur made this statement from Dharamshala in Himachal Pradesh, posting it on his official X account on September 26, 2026.
Has the Election Commission responded to opposition allegations about EVMs?
The Election Commission of India has repeatedly cited its established verification and audit protocols in response to EVM-related allegations, maintaining that the machines are reliable and that results have withstood legal scrutiny.
Nation Press
The Trail

Connected Dots

Tracing the thread behind this story — newest first.

8 Dots
  1. Latest 1 month ago
  2. 2 months ago
  3. 3 months ago
  4. 3 months ago
  5. 3 months ago
  6. 4 months ago
  7. 4 months ago
  8. 1 year ago
Google Prefer NP
On Google