Tharoor Backs Thiruvananthapuram as Permanent IFFK Home
Synopsis
Key Takeaways
Congress MP Dr. Shashi Tharoor wrote to Kerala's Minister for Culture and Tourism, Shri P.C. Vishnunadh, on Saturday, 20 June 2026, urging that the International Film Festival of Keralam (IFFK) retain Thiruvananthapuram as its permanent host city — a status the capital has held for all 30 editions since the festival's founding in 1996.
Context
Tharoor's letter comes on the occasion of the inauguration of the J.C. Daniel International Film City, a new production facility whose arrival has renewed debate over whether Kerala's premier film festival should shift venue. The MP was unambiguous: 'For 30 years that home has been Thiruvananthapuram, and there it should remain.' The festival's 30th edition concluded in the capital this past December 2025.
The IFFK was established in 1996 and has grown, edition after edition, into one of India's most respected non-competitive international film festivals. Three decades of continuity in a single city, Tharoor argued, is itself a foundational asset that no relocation can easily replicate.
Policy Backdrop
Tharoor anchored his case in a well-established global precedent: the International Film Festival of India (IFFI) is held in Goa, not Mumbai — India's production capital — and Cannes is a small Riviera town, not Paris. A festival's prestige, he noted, is built on the consistency and character of its home, not on proximity to studios.
His concrete proposal centres on the Chitranjali Studio complex at Thiruvallam — a 75-acre, government-owned site established in the 1970s and currently underutilised. Tharoor called for reimagining it as a permanent IFFK campus and a year-round home for cinema, pointing to its coastal setting near Kovalam as a natural draw comparable to the seafront atmospheres of Goa and Cannes.
Connectivity, once cited as a drawback for the Thiruvallam location, is no longer a constraint, Tharoor argued. The NH 66 / Thiruvananthapuram bypass — a project he said he 'doggedly pursued since 2011' — now links the city centre, Thiruvallam, Kovalam, and the international airport along a single corridor.
Stakeholders and Impact
Tharoor framed the proposal as simultaneously a cultural investment and a tourism stimulus for Kovalam, positioning the two goals as complementary rather than competing. Strengthening film production infrastructure in Kochi and keeping the festival anchored in the capital, he wrote, are aims Kerala 'can — and should — have both.'
The MP invoked the legacy of J.C. Daniel — the pioneer regarded as the father of Malayalam cinema — who studied in Thiruvananthapuram, built Kerala's first film studio there, and directed Vigathakumaran in the city. A statue of Daniel already stands at Chitranjali. 'Our festival belongs where our cinema was born,' Tharoor wrote. He also called on acclaimed director Adoor Gopalakrishnan, a respected voice on state film policy, to offer counsel on the proposal.
The Malayalam film industry, Kovalam's tourism sector, and Thiruvananthapuram's cultural institutions all have a direct stake in the outcome. A permanent, purpose-built IFFK campus at Chitranjali would also align with broader national efforts to upgrade underutilised public film infrastructure.
What's Next
The immediate focus shifts to Minister P.C. Vishnunadh and the Kerala state government, whose response will determine whether Tharoor's Chitranjali redevelopment vision enters formal policy consideration. Any consultations involving Adoor Gopalakrishnan and other senior figures from the Malayalam film world will be closely watched as signals of the proposal's traction.
With Chitranjali approaching its own golden jubilee, a decision on its future use carries both cultural and fiscal weight. If the state moves to adopt the permanent-campus model, it could set a template for how Indian states anchor festival identity to heritage infrastructure — and how tourism and cinema policy are woven into a single, durable investment.