Is TMC Misinterpreting Calcutta HC Order on Future FIRs?
Click to start listening
Synopsis
Kolkata's political landscape is heating up as Suvendu Adhikari challenges TMC's interpretation of a Calcutta High Court ruling. With allegations of misrepresentation, this ongoing saga raises questions about legal protections and political maneuvering. Stay tuned for insights on the implications of this legal decision and its impact on West Bengal's politics.
Key Takeaways
- Suvendu Adhikari claims TMC is misinterpreting a court order.
- The Calcutta High Court withdrew protections regarding future FIRs.
- 15 FIRs against Adhikari were previously dismissed by the court.
- Investigations will continue under a joint team of state police and CBI.
- Adhikari plans to legally fight any new charges.
Kolkata, Oct 24 (NationPress) The Leader of the Opposition in the West Bengal Assembly, Suvendu Adhikari, accused the Trinamool Congress of intentionally misreading the Calcutta High Court directive that annulled the protection he had from future FIRs without the court's prior approval.
This interim safeguard was initially provided to him in December 2022 by the previous single-judge bench led by Justice Rajasekhar Mantha.
On Friday, the single-judge bench of Justice Jay Sengupta retracted this safeguard, stating that the temporary measure could not be sustained indefinitely.
Reacting to the ruling, Adhikari pointed out that the media is focusing solely on the withdrawal of protection against future FIRs.
“The Trinamool Congress is framing the decision as a major blow to me. However, the reality is that this ruling adversely affects them, as the same bench had already dismissed 15 FIRs against me. For the remaining FIRs, the court has permitted investigations to continue but under a special team that includes representatives from both the state police and the CBI. So, who is truly at a disadvantage? I welcome Friday’s ruling,” stated the Leader of the Opposition.
He further mentioned that with the removal of protection against new FIRs, the state police might resume attempts to implicate him, a challenge he is prepared to confront legally, as he has previously.
“Let them attempt to frame me in false cases again. I will legally resist,” Adhikari asserted.
Point of View
The situation reflects the ongoing tensions between political factions in West Bengal. The allegations of misinterpretation highlight the complex relationship between legal frameworks and political strategies, emphasizing the need for transparency and accountability in governance.
NationPress
28/12/2025
Frequently Asked Questions
What was the Calcutta High Court's recent ruling?
The Calcutta High Court ruled to withdraw the interim protection granted to Suvendu Adhikari regarding future FIRs without prior court approval.
Who is Suvendu Adhikari?
Suvendu Adhikari is the Leader of the Opposition in the West Bengal Assembly, representing the BJP.
What does the ruling mean for Adhikari?
The ruling allows for the continuation of investigations into existing FIRs against him, potentially leading to new allegations.
Why does Adhikari believe this ruling is a setback for TMC?
Adhikari argues that the court had previously dismissed 15 FIRs against him, indicating a favorable stance towards him.
What are Adhikari's next steps following this ruling?
Adhikari intends to legally challenge any new FIRs that may be filed against him by the state police.
