Tourism and human activity hurting tiger breeding in India's 5 major reserves: CSIR-CCMB study
Synopsis
Key Takeaways
Tourism and human activity are pushing tigers in India's major tiger reserves into chronic stress and disrupting their breeding cycles, according to a landmark new study by scientists at the CSIR-Centre for Cellular and Molecular Biology (CSIR-CCMB), Hyderabad. Published in the Zoological Society of London journal Animal Conservation, the research is the first to combine non-invasive stress and reproductive hormone analyses from tigers across five major Indian tiger reserves, offering the most comprehensive physiological portrait of wild tigers under human pressure to date.
What the Study Examined
The research team analysed 610 genetically confirmed tiger scat samples — including 291 from females and 185 from males — collected between 2020 and 2023. Scientists tracked tigers across different parts of India through four seasons over two years, covering reserves at Corbett (Uttarakhand), Tadoba–Andhari (Maharashtra), Kanha and Bandhavgarh (Madhya Pradesh), and Periyar (Kerala).
Two key hormone markers were measured: faecal glucocorticoid metabolites, a biomarker of stress, and faecal progesterone metabolites, an indicator of breeding activity in females. Across all five reserves, tigers ranging close to tourism roads and in areas with greater human disturbance consistently showed elevated stress hormone levels.
A Counterintuitive Finding on Core Zones
One of the study's most striking conclusions challenges a long-held conservation assumption: tigers in strictly protected core zones showed a higher stress response to human-caused disturbance than those living in multi-use buffer zones. The effect was most pronounced in Tadoba and Bandhavgarh.
Researchers attribute this to habituation — buffer-zone tigers are exposed to year-round human presence and appear to have adjusted, whereas core-zone tigers register sharp stress spikes when seasonal tourism enters these otherwise quieter areas. This finding directly challenges the assumption that core zones are uniformly low-stress refuges for wildlife.
What Scientists Said
Dr G. Umapathy, Chief Scientist at CSIR-CCMB and lead researcher on the project, said: