When Will Vijay Mallya Return to India?
Synopsis
Key Takeaways
Mumbai, Feb 18 (NationPress) UK-based entrepreneur Vijay Mallya informed the Bombay High Court on Wednesday that he is unable to indicate when he might return to India. He pointed to restrictions enforced by courts in England, which he claims prevent him from exiting the country.
This issue was addressed by a Bench consisting of Chief Justice Shree Chandrashekhar and Justice Gautam Ankhad, concerning two petitions filed by Mallya. One petition disputes his classification as a “Fugitive Economic Offender” under the Fugitive Economic Offenders Act (FEOA), while the other challenges a court ruling that formally labeled him a fugitive.
Senior advocate Amit Desai, representing Mallya, referenced Supreme Court rulings where writ petitions were entertained even when petitioners were absent.
He argued that the extradition process against Mallya is currently ongoing in the UK and that his client is aware of it but is unable to leave due to existing court orders.
However, the Chief Justice questioned Mallya’s willingness to appear before the court, noting that he seems to be relying on UK court orders without confirming whether those orders have been contested. The Bench indicated that such reliance cannot serve as an unqualified excuse.
The court instructed Solicitor General Tushar Mehta to respond to Mallya’s affidavit. It also requested Desai to provide a comprehensive affidavit documenting all statements made during the proceedings for the Union of India to respond appropriately.
Allowing three weeks for further actions, the Bench remarked that the petitions have been pending since 2019 and noted that no genuine efforts have been made for their prompt resolution. The next hearing is set for March 11.
According to the Finance Ministry, Mallya, the former promoter of Kingfisher Airlines, is among 15 individuals designated as Fugitive Economic Offenders as of October 31, 2025, allegedly causing losses amounting to thousands of crores of rupees to Indian banks.
Previously, the Enforcement Directorate (ED) informed the court that Mallya had submitted affidavits disputing the banks’ claims and was attempting to convert money laundering proceedings into recovery litigation. The agency further asserted that he only challenged the FEO designation after being declared a fugitive and when extradition proceedings in London were at an advanced stage.