What Did the Calcutta HC Decide About WBSSC's Fresh Recruitment Rules?

Synopsis
Key Takeaways
- The Calcutta High Court has approved new recruitment rules for WBSSC.
- Two new weightage criteria have been introduced for teacher selection.
- Identified 'tainted' candidates are barred from participating in the recruitment.
- This decision follows the annulment of over 25,000 school jobs by the Supreme Court.
- The ruling aims to enhance teaching quality in West Bengal's state-run schools.
Kolkata, July 16 (NationPress) The Calcutta High Court has sanctioned the West Bengal School Service Commission (WBSSC) to implement new regulations and weightage criteria for the upcoming recruitment of teachers in state-operated schools.
These teacher vacancies emerged after the Supreme Court's directive in April, which annulled 25,753 school positions.
A Division Bench comprising Justice Soumen Sen and Justice Smita Das rejected a petition contesting the introduction of two new weightage criteria in the recruitment announcement, each worth 10 marks. The criteria include “prior teaching experience” and “lecture demonstration”.
The petitioners argued that the recruitment process should adhere to the 2016 procedures, which were entirely invalidated by the Supreme Court earlier this year.
While the Division Bench dismissed the challenge against the new weightage criteria, it reiterated that its prior directive to exclude identified “tainted” candidates from the fresh recruitment process remains in effect, barring such individuals from participating.
The hearing on the petition contesting the new criteria concluded on July 14, but the order was reserved until Wednesday, offering relief to both the West Bengal government and the WBSSC.
In their defense of the new weightage criteria, the state government and WBSSC representatives argued that the Supreme Court’s April ruling mandated new recruitments but did not stipulate adherence to the 2016 rules.
Conversely, the petitioners’ counsel maintained that the Supreme Court did not grant WBSSC the authority to amend the rules for the recruitment process.
Ultimately, the Bench sided with the state government and WBSSC’s arguments, dismissing the petitioners’ claims.