Has WBSSC Taken Action in Supreme Court to Block Ex-Parte Orders in School Employment Dispute?
Click to start listening
Synopsis
The WBSSC's proactive legal move aims to secure its right to be heard in the Supreme Court concerning the recent ruling on teacher recruitment. This case has significant implications for 32,000 teachers, highlighting the ongoing struggle within the education sector.
Key Takeaways
- WBSSC has taken a legal step to protect its interests in the teacher recruitment case.
- The Calcutta High Court has overturned a ruling that canceled 32,000 teacher appointments.
- Various groups are planning to challenge this decision in the Supreme Court.
- The ongoing situation highlights significant issues within the education sector in West Bengal.
Kolkata, Dec 5 (NationPress) The West Bengal School Service Commission (WBSSC) has submitted a caveat to the Supreme Court, urging that no orders be issued without considering the Commission's stance if a petition is presented against the recent judgment from the Calcutta High Court regarding alleged discrepancies in the recruitment of primary teachers in government-run schools.
On December 3, a division bench of the Calcutta High Court -- consisting of Justice Tapabrata Chakraborty and Justice Ritabrata Kumar Mitra -- overturned a previous single-judge ruling that annulled the appointments of 32,000 primary teachers.
Following this ruling, various dissatisfied groups declared their intention to appeal to the Supreme Court. Prominent attorneys from both the BJP and CPI-M expressed readiness to represent these petitioners at the highest court.
Foreseeing a likely challenge in the Supreme Court, the WBSSC filed the caveat to ensure the court hears its arguments before issuing any interim orders.
The original cancellation of the 32,000 jobs was ordered by Abhijit Gangopadhyay, who was a judge at the Calcutta High Court and is now a BJP Lok Sabha MP.
On December 4, the division bench acknowledged that while irregularities had occurred during the recruitment process, it would be unjust to terminate such a vast number of teachers who have dedicated years of service.
The bench emphasized that innocent individuals involved in the hiring process should not be penalized and warned that nullifying all 32,000 appointments would severely impact the teachers and their families.
The WBSSC's caveat guarantees the Commission will have the opportunity to present its case if any petition contesting the High Court’s ruling reaches the Supreme Court.
Point of View
It is evident that the education sector in West Bengal is facing significant challenges. Balancing the integrity of the recruitment process while ensuring job security for thousands of teachers is a critical issue. The nation must closely follow this case as it unfolds, given its potential impact on educational stability.
NationPress
05/12/2025
Frequently Asked Questions
What did the WBSSC file in the Supreme Court?
The WBSSC filed a caveat requesting the court not to issue orders without hearing its arguments if a petition is filed against the Calcutta High Court's ruling.
What was the outcome of the Calcutta High Court's recent ruling?
The division bench of the Calcutta High Court set aside a single-judge order that had annulled the appointments of 32,000 primary teachers.
Who is Abhijit Gangopadhyay?
Abhijit Gangopadhyay was a judge at the Calcutta High Court who passed the order to cancel the appointments and is now a BJP Lok Sabha MP.
