Could 50 or 60 More Runs Have Changed the Ashes Test Outcome?
Synopsis
Key Takeaways
- Steve Smith believes that an additional 50 or 60 runs could have changed the match's outcome.
- England's bowlers performed exceptionally well, restricting Australia to 132 runs.
- The pitch conditions were heavily skewed in favor of bowlers throughout the match.
- Australia still leads the Ashes series 3-1 despite the loss.
- Adaptability is crucial in cricket, as highlighted by Smith's comments.
Melbourne, Dec 27 (NationPress) Australia’s acting captain Steve Smith acknowledged that an additional 50 or 60 runs over both innings could have changed the result of the fourth Ashes Test, which saw England triumph by four wickets, marking their first win in the country since 2011.
England successfully chased down 175 runs to defeat Australia by four wickets within just two days at the Melbourne Cricket Ground. The visitors dismissed the home side for 132, with Brydon Carse taking 4-34 and captain Ben Stokes securing 3-24, completing the chase in 32.2 overs.
Despite the victory for England, Australia maintains a commanding 3-1 lead in the series. “It’s a tricky situation. Clearly, it was a very fast-paced game! If we had managed to score 50 or 60 runs more across both innings, we might have been in a better position at the end, but credit goes to England for their excellent bowling performance this morning, which prevented us from gaining momentum,” Smith commented after the match.
He pointed out that the pitch was excessively favorable to bowlers, complicating matters for the batsmen. “The pitch offered significant assistance throughout the match. However, when the ball softened after some aggressive batting from their top order, it became slightly easier to handle, but overall, it still presented challenges,” Smith elaborated.
“I believe it was slightly skewed in favor of the bowlers. It was challenging for everyone to settle in. With 36 wickets falling over two days, that’s potentially too many. Perhaps reducing some grass or adjusting the preparation a bit could have been beneficial. But that’s the nature of the game, and we had to adapt,” Smith concluded.