Ashwin questions Sooryavanshi's No. 3 role in 2nd T20I vs New Zealand

Share:
Audio Loading voice…
Ashwin questions Sooryavanshi's No. 3 role in 2nd T20I vs New Zealand

Synopsis

Ravichandran Ashwin didn't mince words after Vaibhav Sooryavanshi's four-ball struggle at No. 3 in Christchurch — calling it a positional misfit rather than a failure of talent. His fix: move Sanju Samson back down the order and let the teenager play where he's most dangerous. With three T20Is left, India's top-order puzzle is far from solved.

Key Takeaways

Ravichandran Ashwin said Vaibhav Sooryavanshi was 'a fish out of water' batting at No.
3 in the 2nd T20I against New Zealand in Christchurch .
Sooryavanshi scored just 4 runs off 8 deliveries on his series debut after replacing the injured Ishan Kishan .
Ashwin suggested Sanju Samson should move to No.
3 to allow Sooryavanshi to bat in a more natural position.
India successfully chased New Zealand's total of 180 , aided by contributions from Tilak Varma , Nitish Kumar Reddy , and Naman Dhir .
Ashwin praised Naman Dhir's ability to hit both pace and spin, singling out his shot-making against Mitchell Santner .
The five-match T20I series continues with India's batting order management set to remain a key talking point.

Former India spinner Ravichandran Ashwin has raised concerns about the team management's decision to bat teenage sensation Vaibhav Sooryavanshi at No. 3 in the second T20I against New Zealand in Christchurch, arguing that the unfamiliar position prevented the youngster from playing his natural, aggressive game. Ashwin suggested that Sanju Samson should occupy that slot if the team intends to field all three batters in the same playing XI.

How Sooryavanshi Came Into the XI

Sooryavanshi made his first appearance in the series after Ishan Kishan was ruled out with an injury. Stepping in at No. 3, the teenager managed only 4 runs off 8 deliveries, with Samson and Abhishek Sharma retaining their positions at the top of the order. The young batter entered during the sixth over — a phase and position that Ashwin said does not suit his batting profile.

Ashwin's Assessment: 'Fish Out of Water'

Speaking on his YouTube channel during a post-match discussion, Ashwin was measured in his critique, acknowledging it was too early to call the innings a definitive 'miss' but identifying the positional mismatch as the core problem.

'That is a miss. For a young cricketer like Vaibhav, 'miss' is too early, I think, to say, but because I have only two options of a hit or a miss, he just found himself a little like a fish out of water. He kept going hard, kept going hard for the eight balls,' Ashwin said.

The former spinner noted that Sooryavanshi appeared to never time the ball cleanly and highlighted the absence of a senior partner to offer guidance at the crease. 'It did not feel like he was ever timing the ball, and that is when you need a senior partner to walk down to him and say, 'Calm down, just hang in there, look to play close to your body, watch the ball better.' Walking in during the sixth over is not his cup of tea,' he added.

Ashwin's Solution: Move Samson to No. 3

Ashwin pointed out that India had previously used this combination with Samson dropping to No. 3, freeing Sooryavanshi to bat in a position better matched to his strengths. 'Look, I think they played this combination before, and Sanju had to skip down to number three. If they are going to go with this combination, I am not too sure Vaibhav has got to bat at number three, but it is what it is. Today it was a miss for Vaibhav,' he stated.

Middle Order Draws Praise

Despite Sooryavanshi's difficult outing, India successfully chased down New Zealand's total of 180, with the middle and lower-middle order providing substantial encouragement. Tilak Varma, Nitish Kumar Reddy, and Naman Dhir all made meaningful contributions to the chase.

Ashwin was particularly effusive about the depth on display. 'India's middle order is coming through nicely. That is six, seven, and eight. It looks pretty dangerous. Naman Dhir is a very good hitter of pace bowling. He is showing that he can really club spinners as well. To stand and hit a spinner of Mitchell Santner's pedigree is no joke,' he said. He added that Tilak Varma was 'echoing great temperament', while reserving judgement on Nitish Kumar Reddy's temperament, noting there was 'enough power for teams to be concerned about.'

What It Means for the Remaining Matches

With three matches remaining in the five-match T20I series, India's team management faces a selection puzzle at the top of the order. How they deploy Sooryavanshi going forward — and whether Samson is asked once again to drop to No. 3 — could prove a defining tactical question as both sides look to gain the upper hand in the series.

Point of View

The episode reveals a recurring pattern in Indian T20 selection — imported talent gets a position, not a role, and the positional mismatch is then misread as a performance failure. India's middle order, for all the praise it earned, should not be a reason to persist with a structural error at the top.
NationPress
25 Oct 2026

Frequently Asked Questions

Why did Ravichandran Ashwin criticise Vaibhav Sooryavanshi's batting in the 2nd T20I?
Ashwin argued that batting Sooryavanshi at No. 3 placed the teenager in an unfamiliar role that restricted his natural attacking game. He noted that Sooryavanshi entered in the sixth over — a phase he described as 'not his cup of tea' — and never found his timing across eight deliveries.
How did Vaibhav Sooryavanshi perform in the 2nd T20I against New Zealand?
Sooryavanshi scored 4 runs off 8 deliveries batting at No. 3 in Christchurch. It was his first appearance in the series, after Ishan Kishan was ruled out injured.
What solution did Ashwin propose for India's batting order?
Ashwin suggested moving Sanju Samson back to No. 3 — a position he had occupied when this combination was previously used — to allow Sooryavanshi to bat in a more suitable slot. He noted the team had tried this arrangement before.
How did India's middle order perform in the 2nd T20I?
India successfully chased New Zealand's 180, with Tilak Varma, Nitish Kumar Reddy, and Naman Dhir all contributing. Ashwin singled out Naman Dhir's ability to hit both pace and spin, calling his shot-play against Mitchell Santner particularly impressive.
How many matches remain in the India vs New Zealand T20I series?
Three matches remain in the five-match T20I series. India's batting order management, particularly where Sooryavanshi fits in, is expected to be a key selection discussion heading into the remaining games.
Nation Press
The Trail

Connected Dots

Tracing the thread behind this story — newest first.

8 Dots
  1. Latest 2 months ago
  2. 2 months ago
  3. 2 months ago
  4. 3 months ago
  5. 3 months ago
  6. 5 months ago
  7. 1 year ago
  8. 1 year ago
Google Prefer NP
On Google