Sinner, Sabalenka, Gauff slam French Open prize money hike as insufficient
Synopsis
Key Takeaways
Leading tennis stars Jannik Sinner, Aryna Sabalenka, and Coco Gauff have issued a joint statement criticising the French Open's prize money distribution, arguing that a newly announced 10% increase to €61.7 million (approximately $72.1 million) fails to reflect players' contribution to the tournament's surging revenues. The rebuke comes ahead of the May 24 start of Roland Garros 2026 in Paris.
The revenue-to-prize gap
Roland Garros generated €395 million in revenue in 2025, a 14% year-on-year increase, yet prize money rose by only 5.4%, according to the players' statement. With estimated revenues exceeding €400 million for 2026, prize money is projected to represent less than 15% of total revenue — far below the 22% threshold players have requested to align Grand Slams with ATP and WTA combined events.
Prize structure for 2026
Singles champions will receive €2.8 million, while runners-up earn €1.4 million. Semifinalists collect €750,000, and first-round losers receive €87,000. Doubles champions take home €600,000, and mixed doubles winners earn €122,000.
Governance and welfare concerns
Beyond financial distribution, the players highlighted structural grievances. They stated that organisers have shown no engagement on player welfare and have resisted establishing a formal mechanism for player consultation in Grand Slam decision-making. The statement underscored the absence of progress on pensions, long-term health provisions, and transparent player representation within governance frameworks.
The broader dispute
This marks a continuation of tensions that began last year when a group of top-ranked players first raised concerns with Grand Slam organisers. The latest statement was issued on behalf of the original signatories, though Novak Djokovic did not sign this iteration. Players emphasised that despite record revenues, their share of the value they generate continues to decline — a pattern they argue reflects a system resistant to meaningful reform.
What's at stake
The dispute underscores a widening chasm between Grand Slam profitability and player compensation. As tennis viewership and sponsorship revenue climb, players argue they lack institutional voice in how those gains are distributed and how the sport is governed. The French Open's response to these demands remains unclear as the tournament approaches.