Sandpapergate: Warner 'proven CA withheld information' in 2018, says manager Erskine

Share:
Audio Loading voice…
Sandpapergate: Warner 'proven CA withheld information' in 2018, says manager Erskine

Synopsis

Sandpapergate refuses to die — and now David Warner's manager is pointing the finger squarely at Cricket Australia. James Erskine's claim that CA actively withheld the fact that Lyon, Starc and Hazlewood were interviewed puts the board on the back foot and renews pressure to release Iain Roy's suppressed investigation report, sealed under an NDA.

Key Takeaways

James Erskine claims David Warner would not have signed his one-year ban had he known bowlers Lyon , Starc and Hazlewood were interviewed in the 2018 CA investigation.
Erskine alleged Warner was told only Pat Cummins , Steve Smith , Cameron Bancroft and himself had been interviewed — not the three fast bowlers.
Investigator Iain Roy reportedly signed an NDA and left Cricket Australia ; his full report has never been released.
Warner issued multiple Instagram posts accusing CA of running a 'shoddy investigation' and a 'cover-up'.
The 2018 scandal resulted in bans of one year each for Warner and Smith, and nine months for Bancroft.
CA has not yet publicly responded to the latest allegations as of 15 November 2026 .

David Warner's manager James Erskine has claimed that the former Australian vice-captain would never have accepted his one-year ban in the Sandpapergate scandal had he known that bowlers Nathan Lyon, Mitchell Starc, and Josh Hazlewood were interviewed as part of Cricket Australia's (CA) 2018 investigation. Erskine alleged that Warner has now 'proven without any hesitation' that CA withheld critical information during that process.

How the Controversy Resurfaced

The Sandpapergate affair has re-entered the headlines after Warner recently claimed — prefacing his remark with 'as far as I am aware' — that Hazlewood, Lyon, and Starc were not interviewed by CA during its immediate post-scandal investigation. The clarification became necessary after a Sydney Morning Herald report confirmed that all three bowlers had, in fact, been interviewed. Warner subsequently stated he had 'never been told the bowlers had been interviewed or provided statements' when he signed the agreement accepting his ban.

What Erskine Alleged

Erskine, speaking on Sunday, applied direct pressure on CA to release the full report of the investigation conducted by Iain Roy, who was then CA's head of integrity. According to reports, Erskine said Warner would not have put his name to the ban agreement had he been aware that the trio were interviewed. 'The Roy report has never come out. Roy was basically muzzled, signed an NDA (non-disclosure agreement) and ended up leaving Cricket Australia,' Erskine said, as quoted by the Australian publication.

Erskine further alleged that Warner was specifically misled about who had given statements. 'When David was told these people had made statements, he was not told it included those bowlers (Lyon, Starc and Hazlewood). He has now proven without any hesitation that in 2018, Cricket Australia withheld information. They told him these were the only people that had been interviewed, but it wasn't true. He was told in 2018 one was Pat Cummins, and the others were Smith, Bancroft and him,' Erskine added, according to the report.

Warner's Own Statements

Taking to Instagram over the last two days, Warner issued a series of posts challenging CA's handling of the affair. On Saturday, he wrote: 'As far as I am aware, CA did not interview Josh Hazlewood, Mitchell Starc or Nathan Lyon in their 2018 investigation. If that's correct, then how can CA push the idea that the bowlers didn't know? It looks like they had decided who they wanted to blame from the very beginning, ran a shoddy investigation to serve the purpose, and now they want to maintain the false narrative that the bowlers had no idea. That stinks of a cover-up.'

After the SMH report confirmed the trio had been interviewed, Warner clarified in a follow-up post: 'Just to clarify, 'as far as I am aware' was the POINT. I was never told the bowlers had been interviewed or provided statements. That information would've been pretty useful when I was forced to make decisions in 2018. Why weren't we given all the evidence by CA?'

Background: The 2018 Ball-Tampering Scandal

The Sandpapergate scandal erupted during Australia's 2018 Test series against South Africa when television cameras caught Cameron Bancroft using sandpaper to illegally alter the condition of the ball. The fallout saw Warner and Steve Smith each handed one-year bans, while Bancroft received a nine-month suspension. Warner was additionally barred from holding any leadership role in Australian cricket. The severity of the penalties — widely seen as placing disproportionate blame on a small group — has been contested by Warner's camp ever since.

What Happens Next

Erskine's statements add fresh urgency to calls for CA to publicly release the Roy investigation report. Warner has also reportedly sought to review the original statements given to Roy during the probe. CA has not yet publicly responded to the latest allegations. With Warner pushing for the suppressed findings to be made public, the board faces mounting pressure to either release the report or explain why it remains under an NDA.

Point of View

CA ran an investigation that selectively disclosed witness evidence to the accused before they accepted their punishments, which fundamentally undermines the integrity of that process. The fact that the Roy report remains sealed under an NDA years later, with its author having left the organisation, raises questions CA cannot answer with silence. Warner's campaign may be partly self-serving, but the procedural allegation — that the accused were not shown the full evidence before signing ban agreements — is a serious one that deserves a formal, independent response.
NationPress
15 Nov 2026

Frequently Asked Questions

What did James Erskine claim about Cricket Australia and Sandpapergate?
Erskine alleged that CA withheld information from David Warner in 2018 by not disclosing that bowlers Nathan Lyon, Mitchell Starc and Josh Hazlewood had been interviewed as part of the investigation. He said Warner would not have signed the agreement accepting his one-year ban had he been given that information at the time.
What is the Iain Roy report and why hasn't it been released?
Iain Roy was Cricket Australia's head of integrity who led the internal investigation into the 2018 ball-tampering scandal. According to Erskine, Roy subsequently signed a non-disclosure agreement and left CA, and his full investigation report has never been made public. Warner's camp has called on CA to release the report.
What did David Warner say about Lyon, Starc and Hazlewood being interviewed?
Warner initially claimed, 'as far as I am aware', that the three bowlers were not interviewed by CA in 2018. After reports confirmed they were, he clarified that his point was that he had never been told they were interviewed — and that the information would have been 'pretty useful' before he was 'forced to make decisions' about accepting his ban.
What penalties were handed out in the 2018 Sandpapergate scandal?
David Warner and Steve Smith each received one-year bans from international and domestic cricket, while Cameron Bancroft was suspended for nine months. Warner was also barred from holding a leadership role in Australian cricket for an extended period.
Has Cricket Australia responded to the latest Sandpapergate allegations?
As of 15 November 2026, Cricket Australia had not issued a public response to the allegations made by Erskine or to Warner's Instagram posts. Pressure is mounting on the board to either release the Roy report or formally address the claims of withheld evidence.
Nation Press
The Trail

Connected Dots

Tracing the thread behind this story — newest first.

8 Dots
  1. Latest 1 hour ago
  2. 8 hours ago
  3. Yesterday
  4. 3 days ago
  5. 3 days ago
  6. 4 days ago
  7. 5 days ago
  8. 6 days ago
Google Prefer NP
On Google