Warner doubles down on Sandpapergate cover-up claim, demands CA explain withheld evidence

Share:
Audio Loading voice…
Warner doubles down on Sandpapergate cover-up claim, demands CA explain withheld evidence

Synopsis

Eight years after Cape Town, Sandpapergate is tearing Australian cricket apart again. David Warner is now asking a pointed new question: why did Cricket Australia withhold evidence from the accused players during the 2018 inquiry? With Usman Khawaja's book alleging full squad knowledge and Pat Cummins publicly dismissing it, the fault lines inside Australia's dressing room have never been more visible.

Key Takeaways

David Warner has publicly doubled down on his claim that Cricket Australia's 2018 Sandpapergate investigation was a cover-up.
Warner alleged on Instagram that he was never informed bowlers had been interviewed or had given statements during the inquiry.
Usman Khawaja's autobiography Sabr alleges the entire Test squad knew about the sandpaper plan in Cape Town .
Captain Pat Cummins called Khawaja's claims 'nonsense' and ' 100 percent wrong ' at a 68-minute press conference on Friday .
CA chief executive Todd Greenberg said the board has no plans to reopen the investigation.
Warner and Steve Smith each served 12-month bans; Cameron Bancroft was suspended for nine months following the original inquiry.

Former Australia opener David Warner has refused to back down from his assertion that Cricket Australia's (CA) inquiry into the 2018 Sandpapergate ball-tampering scandal amounted to a cover-up, escalating pressure on the board by publicly asking why players were never given the full evidence at the time of the investigation.

Warner's Key Accusation

In a pointed post on his Instagram account on Sunday, Warner challenged CA's handling of the original inquiry. 'Just to clarify, ‘as far as I am aware’, was the POINT. I was never told the bowlers had been interviewed or provided statements. That information would have been pretty useful when I was forced to make decisions back in 2018. Why weren’t we given all the evidence by CA?' he wrote.

The statement is notable for its specificity — Warner is not merely questioning the outcome of the investigation but the process itself, alleging that players were kept in the dark about key evidence while simultaneously being asked to accept blame and punishment.

Khawaja's Book Reignites the Controversy

The renewed furore around the Cape Town scandal was triggered by Usman Khawaja's recently released autobiography, Sabr. In the book, Khawaja alleges that the entire Test squad was aware of the plan to use sandpaper on the ball — a claim that significantly widens the circle of culpability beyond the three players who were sanctioned.

Warner, a childhood friend of Khawaja, has publicly backed the account. This comes amid broader scrutiny of whether CA's original investigation was thorough or selectively prosecuted.

Cummins and Warner Clash Publicly

Australia captain Pat Cummins addressed the media at a 68-minute press conference on Friday, dismissing Khawaja's allegations as 'nonsense' and '100 percent wrong.' The remarks drew a swift and sharp response from Warner, who was present as part of the Fox Sports commentary team for the first One Day International (ODI) against England in Perth.

'Pat Cummins was very well prepared this morning. I still stick by Uzzy and what he’s written in that book. It’s the truth, and I really support him. I actually feel for him at the moment. I actually feel that the captain today actually threw Uzzy under the bus, and I’m very, very disappointed about that,' Warner said.

The public rift between Warner and Cummins underscores how deeply the Sandpapergate fallout continues to divide Australian cricket, even eight years on.

CA Refuses to Reopen Inquiry

Cricket Australia chief executive Todd Greenberg responded on Saturday by firmly shutting the door on any renewed investigation. Speaking on radio, Greenberg said: 'We don’t see any compelling reason to open the investigation or revisit this again. I don’t think there’s anything that can be gained from that.'

He added that CA remains comfortable with the original outcome. 'We have said we’re comfortable with the outcome of the investigation based on the information we’ve received. That includes what we’ve seen from Usman [Khawaja], and our position hasn’t changed on that.'

Greenberg also argued that revisiting the matter served no constructive purpose, noting that 'the matter was dealt with under a previous leadership back in 2018.'

The Sanctions and What Is at Stake

Following the original Cape Town investigation, Warner and then-captain Steve Smith each received 12-month suspensions, while opener Cameron Bancroft was banned for nine months. Bancroft was the player caught on camera using sandpaper on the ball during the third Test against South Africa.

If Khawaja's account is accurate and broader squad knowledge existed, the original inquiry's scope and conclusions would appear deeply flawed — which is precisely why CA appears resistant to any review. How the board navigates this narrative in the weeks ahead will be closely watched across the cricketing world.

Point of View

That is not merely a historical grievance; it is a governance failure that casts doubt on the legitimacy of the entire process. CA's posture — 'we're comfortable, there's nothing to gain, it was a previous leadership' — essentially asks the public to trust a closed file. With a credible autobiography and an aggrieved former player both pointing in the same direction, that trust is becoming harder to extend.
NationPress
15 Nov 2026

Frequently Asked Questions

What is David Warner's Sandpapergate cover-up claim?
Warner has alleged that Cricket Australia's 2018 investigation into the Cape Town ball-tampering scandal was a cover-up, specifically claiming he was never informed that bowlers had been interviewed or given statements during the inquiry. He argues this information was critical and should have been shared before players were asked to accept punishments.
What does Usman Khawaja's book allege about Sandpapergate?
Khawaja's autobiography, Sabr, released in November 2026, alleges that the entire Australian Test squad was aware of the plan to use sandpaper on the ball during the 2018 Test against South Africa in Cape Town. This directly contradicts the findings of Cricket Australia's original investigation, which penalised only three players.
What did Pat Cummins say about Khawaja's allegations?
Australia captain Pat Cummins, at a 68-minute press conference on Friday, described Khawaja's allegations as 'nonsense' and '100 percent wrong.' Warner publicly criticised Cummins's response, accusing the captain of 'throwing Uzzy under the bus.'
Will Cricket Australia reopen the Sandpapergate investigation?
No. CA chief executive Todd Greenberg said on Saturday that the board sees no compelling reason to reopen the inquiry, stating the matter was dealt with under previous leadership in 2018 and that CA remains comfortable with the original outcome.
What penalties did Warner, Smith, and Bancroft receive for ball-tampering?
David Warner and then-captain Steve Smith each received 12-month bans, while Cameron Bancroft — the player caught on camera using sandpaper — was suspended for nine months. Warner also had a leadership ban applied, though that was later lifted following a review.
Nation Press
The Trail

Connected Dots

Tracing the thread behind this story — newest first.

8 Dots
  1. Latest Yesterday
  2. 2 days ago
  3. 3 days ago
  4. 5 days ago
  5. 5 days ago
  6. 6 days ago
  7. 1 week ago
  8. 1 week ago
Google Prefer NP
On Google