Why Did the Bar Council of India Suspend Advocate Rakesh Kishore?
Click to start listening
Synopsis
The Bar Council of India has suspended advocate Rakesh Kishore after he attempted to assault Chief Justice B.R. Gavai. The incident occurred in the Supreme Court, prompting immediate disciplinary action. This suspension underscores the importance of maintaining decorum and respect within the legal profession.
Key Takeaways
- Immediate Suspension: Rakesh Kishore is suspended for threatening behavior.
- Legal Prohibition: He cannot practice law during this period.
- Affidavit Requirement: He must confirm compliance with the suspension.
- Court Security: The incident raises concerns about courtroom safety.
- Disciplinary Actions: Further actions may follow based on his response.
New Delhi, Oct 6 (NationPress) The Bar Council of India (BCI) has taken immediate action by suspending advocate Rakesh Kishore after he made an attempt to assault the Chief Justice of India (CJI) B.R. Gavai within the premises of the Supreme Court.
In an official letter addressed to advocate Rakesh Kishore and the Bar Council of Delhi, BCI Chairperson Manan Kumar Mishra noted that Kishore’s actions were in violation of its Rules regarding Standards of Professional Conduct and Etiquette, as well as the court's dignity.
“At approximately 11:35 a.m. on October 6, 2025, in Court No. 1 of the Supreme Court of India, you, Advocate Rakesh Kishore, who is registered with the Bar Council of Delhi under enrollment numbers D/1647/2009, removed your sports shoes and attempted to throw them at the Hon'ble Chief Justice during ongoing court proceedings. Security personnel quickly detained you… Therefore, you are hereby suspended from legal practice effective immediately,” the interim order specified.
During this suspension, Kishore is prohibited from appearing, acting, pleading, or practicing in any court, tribunal, or authority across India.
The BCI instructed the Delhi Bar Council to ensure that its interim order is promptly executed by updating Kishore’s status in its records and notifying all courts and tribunals within its jurisdiction.
The suspension order is to be disseminated to the registries of the Supreme Court, all High Courts, and all District Courts, as well as relevant Bar Associations, including the Supreme Court Bar Association.
“Any identification card, proximity pass, or access authorization granted by any court or Bar Association in your capacity as an advocate will be rendered invalid throughout the duration of this suspension,” the order continued.
Kishore is also required to submit an affidavit of compliance within 48 hours of receiving the suspension notice, confirming that he is not participating in any legal matters during this period.
A show cause notice will be issued, asking him to respond within 15 days regarding why the suspension should not be extended and why further disciplinary measures should not be pursued.
“This order is provisional and does not prejudice any proceedings under the general law or the Advocates Act, 1961,” the BCI clarified.
Point of View
It is imperative to highlight that the Bar Council's swift decision to suspend Rakesh Kishore reflects a commitment to uphold the integrity of the judiciary. Such actions, while rare, are necessary to maintain public confidence in the legal system.
NationPress
07/10/2025
Frequently Asked Questions
What led to the suspension of advocate Rakesh Kishore?
Advocate Rakesh Kishore was suspended for attempting to attack Chief Justice B.R. Gavai during a court session, violating the standards of professional conduct.
What are the consequences of the suspension?
Kishore is barred from practicing law in any court or tribunal in India during the suspension period.
How long is the suspension expected to last?
The suspension is currently interim, with a show cause notice issued for further disciplinary action.
What must Kishore do during his suspension?
He must file an affidavit confirming he is not appearing in any legal matters during the suspension.
What is the significance of this incident?
This incident highlights the need for maintaining decorum and respect within the legal profession.
