Why is the Bengal Government Urging the Supreme Court for an Urgent Hearing on the New OBC List?

Synopsis
Key Takeaways
- West Bengal government seeks urgent hearing from Supreme Court.
- Calcutta High Court placed an interim stay on the new OBC list.
- The new list aims to include 140 communities.
- Interim stay could impact recruitment processes.
- Previous OBC certificates since 2010 have been annulled.
New Delhi, July 24 (NationPress) The government of West Bengal has called upon the Supreme Court to prioritize its plea regarding the interim stay placed by the Calcutta High Court on the release of the new Other Backward Class (OBC) list. During a session with a bench led by Chief Justice of India (CJI) B.R. Gavai, senior advocate Kapil Sibal brought this matter to attention, requesting an immediate hearing.
In response, CJI Gavai confirmed that the case would be scheduled for review on Monday, July 28.
On June 17, an interim ruling from a division bench of the Calcutta HC instructed the state government to refrain from publishing the final notification for the new OBC list until July 31.
The bench, comprising Justices Tapabrata Chakraborty and Rajasekhar Mantha, expressed that the earlier notifications issued by the West Bengal government regarding a new survey for the OBC list potentially contravened orders from the Supreme Court.
The updated OBC list was meant to encompass 140 communities, and the interim stay was viewed as a significant setback for the government led by Mamata Banerjee.
In its petition to the apex court, the state administration contended that if the Calcutta High Court's interim stay remains in effect until July 31, it would hinder the recruitment process for this category, as previously directed by the Supreme Court.
Earlier in May 2024, the Calcutta High Court annulled all OBC certificates issued in West Bengal post-2010, effectively nullifying all such certificates released under the current Trinamool Congress government since 2011.
The West Bengal government subsequently approached the Supreme Court against this decision, and in March, the court permitted the state to implement a fresh survey to identify OBCs.
Allegations of appeasement politics arose concerning the fresh survey process, leading to a petition filed in the Calcutta High Court challenging the survey methodology. This petition accused the state of only considering applications from the 113 OBC communities that were invalidated by the Calcutta High Court in the previous year. An interim stay on the final notification for the revised OBC list was issued on June 17 by the bench led by Justice Chakraborty.