Brij Bhushan Sharan Singh, Baba Ramdev end 4-year feud after Delhi meeting

Share:
Audio Loading voice…
Brij Bhushan Sharan Singh, Baba Ramdev end 4-year feud after Delhi meeting

Synopsis

A four-year public spat between BJP heavyweight Brij Bhushan Sharan Singh and yoga-to-FMCG mogul Baba Ramdev — marked by a ₹50-crore defamation suit, 'adulterator' allegations, and a wrestling harassment row — came to an abrupt end on Wednesday after the two met in New Delhi. What prompted the sudden truce, and whether the court case follows, remains the key question.

Key Takeaways

Brij Bhushan Sharan Singh and Baba Ramdev met in New Delhi on 23 September 2026 and declared their differences resolved.
The feud spanned approximately four years , rooted in Singh's claims that Patanjali had done nothing for the birthplace of Maharishi Patanjali in Gonda, Uttar Pradesh .
Patanjali Foods Limited had filed a ₹50-crore defamation suit against Singh in the Madhya Pradesh High Court over his criticism of its ghee.
Singh had called Ramdev the 'emperor of adulterators' and alleged several Patanjali products were banned abroad.
In 2023 , Ramdev reportedly sided with female wrestlers who accused Singh of sexual harassment during his time as WFI president.
Whether the pending legal proceedings will now be withdrawn remains to be seen.

Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) leader and former MP Brij Bhushan Sharan Singh and yoga guru Baba Ramdev have resolved a long-running public dispute, with Ramdev confirming on Wednesday, 23 September that the two met in New Delhi and settled their differences. The reconciliation ends a feud that had played out across courtrooms, press conferences, and public platforms over four years.

What Ramdev Said After the Meeting

Ramdev stated that Singh had developed certain misgivings about him based on hearsay and video clips, and that those doubts were addressed and cleared during the meeting. He thanked Singh and noted that the former Wrestling Federation of India (WFI) president offered his respects, expressed high regard for sants and Sanatana, and acknowledged Ramdev's work for the country in high esteem.

Roots of the 4-Year Dispute

The rift between the two public figures dates back approximately four years. Singh — a six-term MP born in Bishnoharpur village of Gonda district, Uttar Pradesh — had alleged that Ramdev and his organisation had done nothing for the birthplace of ancient Indian sage Maharishi Patanjali, whom Singh claimed was from Gonda. Patanjali is widely regarded as the father of classical yoga and the author of the Yoga Sutras.

Singh had publicly demanded that Ramdev and Patanjali managing director Balakrishna stop using the sage's name for commercial purposes. He also advised people to rear their own buffaloes and cows for pure milk and ghee, rather than purchasing what he characterised as inferior branded products.

Legal Battle and Escalating Accusations

Patanjali Foods Limited escalated the conflict by filing a ₹50-crore defamation suit against Singh in the Madhya Pradesh High Court, after he publicly criticised its ghee as 'fake'. In response, Singh alleged that Ramdev was the 'emperor of adulterators,' claiming several Patanjali products had been banned in other countries.

The dispute drew further heat when Singh was embroiled in a sexual harassment controversy in 2023, with female wrestlers accusing him of misconduct during his tenure as WFI head. Ramdev reportedly sided with the complainants at the time. As recently as last month, Singh accused Ramdev of introducing spurious and foreign goods under the banner of 'Swadeshi.'

Political Significance of the Truce

Both figures carry considerable influence within the broader Hindu nationalist ecosystem — Singh as a mass-contact politician from Uttar Pradesh, and Ramdev as a brand-builder with a vast grassroots following. Their public quarrel had been an unusual spectacle within circles aligned to the BJP. The reconciliation, notably, comes ahead of a politically sensitive period in the state.

With the two now sitting together and declaring the feud closed, attention will turn to whether the legal proceedings — including the ₹50-crore defamation suit — are also withdrawn or settled out of court.

Point of View

Coming after Singh's WFI-related controversies and Patanjali's own regulatory headaches, suggests both sides had reasons to de-escalate. The open question is whether the ₹50-crore defamation suit quietly dies with the feud, or continues as a legal instrument that outlasts the political handshake. In the UP political ecosystem, alliances between mass-base politicians and godmen-turned-businessmen have a transactional logic — and Wednesday's meeting looks very much like that logic reasserting itself.
NationPress
23 Sept 2026

Frequently Asked Questions

Why did Brij Bhushan Sharan Singh and Baba Ramdev have a feud?
The dispute began roughly four years ago when Singh alleged that Ramdev's organisation had done nothing for Gonda, Uttar Pradesh — which Singh claimed as the birthplace of sage Maharishi Patanjali. Singh demanded that Ramdev and Patanjali MD Balakrishna stop using the sage's name commercially. The conflict later expanded to include a ₹50-crore defamation suit and accusations of adulterated products.
What was the ₹50-crore defamation case about?
Patanjali Foods Limited filed a ₹50-crore defamation suit against Singh in the Madhya Pradesh High Court after he publicly called its ghee 'fake' and advised people to make their own at home. Singh had also claimed Ramdev was an 'emperor of adulterators' and that several Patanjali products were banned in other countries.
How did Baba Ramdev respond to the reconciliation?
Ramdev stated that Singh had formed misgivings based on hearsay and video clips, and that these were cleared during their meeting on 23 September. He thanked Singh and said the former WFI chief had expressed high regard for sants, Sanatana, and Ramdev's work for the country.
What was Ramdev's role in the wrestler harassment controversy involving Singh?
When female wrestlers accused Singh of sexual harassment during his tenure as Wrestling Federation of India president in 2023 and sought his arrest, Ramdev reportedly stood with the complainants — adding another layer of tension to the already bitter feud.
What happens to the legal case now that the feud is settled?
It remains unclear whether Patanjali Foods Limited's ₹50-crore defamation suit in the Madhya Pradesh High Court will be withdrawn following the reconciliation. Neither side has announced any formal settlement of the pending litigation as of 23 September 2026.
Nation Press
The Trail

Connected Dots

Tracing the thread behind this story — newest first.

8 Dots
  1. Latest 1 month ago
  2. 1 month ago
  3. 1 month ago
  4. 1 month ago
  5. 2 months ago
  6. 4 months ago
  7. 1 year ago
  8. 1 year ago
Google Prefer NP
On Google