Why Did the Calcutta HC Deny Humayun Kabir's Request for CAPF Security?
Click to start listening
Synopsis
The Calcutta High Court has denied Humayun Kabir's request for CAPF security cover, directing him instead to seek assistance from the Union Ministry of Home Affairs. This decision comes amidst Kabir's claims of facing life threats as a suspended Trinamool Congress legislator. The court emphasizes that security determinations rest with the Union Home Ministry.
Key Takeaways
- The Calcutta High Court has denied Humayun Kabir's plea for CAPF security cover.
- Justice Suvra Ghosh directed him to approach the Union Home Ministry.
- Kabir's claims of danger stem from the state government's failure to provide security.
- He has faced reprimands from the Trinamool Congress before his suspension.
- Kabir's new party is currently seeking political alliances.
Kolkata, Jan 19 (NationPress) The Calcutta High Court on Monday dismissed the request made by Humayun Kabir, a suspended legislator from the Trinamool Congress and founder of the new Janata Unnayan Party (JUP), for security cover from the Central Armed Police Forces (CAPF).
A single-judge bench, led by Justice Suvra Ghosh, advised Kabir, the representative from the Bharatpur Assembly constituency in Murshidabad district of West Bengal, to approach the Union Ministry of Home Affairs for his security needs.
Recently, Kabir sought 'Z Plus' security, claiming that he was under threat due to the state government's failure to provide adequate protection.
As the case was presented on Monday, Justice Ghosh's bench ultimately opted not to consider his plea, directing him instead to consult the Union Home Ministry directly.
Justice Ghosh remarked that it is the Union Home Ministry that determines the eligibility for security categories based on assessed threats.
Historically, Kabir has faced reprimands from Trinamool Congress leadership for his public statements, which have caused disruptions within the party. Eventually, he was suspended after announcing plans for a Babri mosque in Beldanga, Murshidabad.
Following his suspension, he established his own party, expressing a willingness to ally with any political entity not affiliated with BJP or Trinamool Congress.
However, as of now, no political entity has shown interest in collaborating with Kabir's newly formed party.
Point of View
The decision of the Calcutta High Court reflects a significant stance on security issues and political accountability. While the claims made by Kabir warrant attention, the court's directive to approach the Union Ministry of Home Affairs underscores the importance of established protocols in addressing security concerns.
NationPress
22/01/2026
Frequently Asked Questions
Why did the Calcutta High Court reject Kabir's plea for CAPF security?
The court advised Kabir to approach the Union Ministry of Home Affairs, which is responsible for determining security cover based on threat assessments.
What security level was Kabir seeking?
Kabir sought 'Z Plus' security cover, citing life threats due to the lack of protection from the state government.
What led to Kabir's suspension from the Trinamool Congress?
Kabir was suspended after repeatedly making statements that caused issues for the party and later announced plans for a Babri mosque in Murshidabad.
Has any political force shown interest in allying with Kabir's new party?
As of now, no political entity has expressed willingness to ally with Kabir's newly formed Janata Unnayan Party.
What is the focus of the Union Home Ministry regarding security?
The Union Home Ministry decides on security cover based on the threat assessment for individuals, determining who qualifies for various security levels.
