Has the Calcutta HC Imposed an Interim Stay on Supernumerary Teacher Appointments?
Click to start listening
Synopsis
The Calcutta High Court has placed an interim stay on supernumerary teacher appointments in West Bengal. This decision stems from ongoing legal battles over recruitment processes, raising questions about job security and educational standards in the state. The court's involvement underscores the complexities of educational governance and the need for transparency.
Key Takeaways
- Calcutta High Court issues interim stay on appointments.
- Focus on transparency in educational recruitment.
- Legal battles highlight the complexity of job security.
- Next court hearing on June 18.
- Protests reflect candidate frustrations over job cancellations.
Kolkata, May 7 (NationPress) The Calcutta High Court has issued an interim stay regarding the supernumerary appointments of educators for the upper primary sections in West Bengal's state-run schools as of Wednesday.
The appointments were intended for two subjects: physical education and work education, with the state government establishing supernumerary positions to recruit from candidates on the waiting list.
This isn't the first instance of the Calcutta High Court halting supernumerary appointments. Just last month, a Supreme Court bench led by Chief Justice of India Sanjiv Khanna and Justice Sanjay Kumar upheld the decision of a Calcutta High Court division bench that annulled 25,753 teaching (both secondary and higher secondary) and non-teaching positions in state-run schools, previously appointed by the West Bengal School Service Commission.
Nonetheless, the Supreme Court did not question the state government's move to create supernumerary roles for the upper primary section.
Subsequently, the state government sought Calcutta High Court's approval for these supernumerary appointments. After extensive discussions, Justice Biswajit Basu of a single-judge bench decided to impose an interim stay on these recruitments.
This issue is set to be reviewed again on June 18.
Recently, candidates aspiring for teaching roles in the upper primary section staged a protest outside the office of senior advocate and CPI-M Rajya Sabha member Bikas Ranjan Bhattacharya, expressing their frustration over his legal arguments that often result in the cancellation of school jobs in West Bengal. The protesters also made derogatory remarks about Justice Basu due to his negative observations in certain cases regarding an alleged school-job scam.
Chief Justice T.S. Sivagnanam of the Calcutta High Court took notice of these events, directing Kolkata Police Commissioner Manoj Kumar Verma to identify the protesters and investigate further. The high court has also initiated a suo motu contempt of court case concerning this matter.
Point of View
It is essential to recognize that the Calcutta High Court's decision reflects a critical examination of the hiring processes in West Bengal's education system. The ongoing legal scrutiny highlights the importance of ensuring fairness and transparency in recruitment, which ultimately affects the quality of education provided to students across the state.
NationPress
23/06/2025
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the significance of the Calcutta High Court's interim stay?
The interim stay halts supernumerary teacher appointments, emphasizing the need for due legal process and fairness in educational recruitment.
What prompted the protests by candidates?
Candidates protested against legal arguments that led to job cancellations, expressing their frustrations towards key legal figures involved in the process.
When will the matter be heard again?
The next hearing regarding this issue is scheduled for June 18.
What subjects were affected by the supernumerary appointments?
The supernumerary appointments were specifically for physical education and work education in upper primary sections.
What institutions are involved in this legal matter?
The West Bengal School Service Commission and the Calcutta High Court are key institutions involved in this case.
