Did the Calcutta HC Order Publication of ‘Untainted’ Non-Teaching Staff List?
Click to start listening
Synopsis
The Calcutta High Court has ordered the WBSSC to publish a list of non-teaching staff deemed 'untainted' from the 2016 panel. This decision aims to facilitate their participation in the upcoming recruitment process and ensure they receive age relaxations, following a Supreme Court ruling. This pivotal ruling shines a light on allegations of corruption and job security.
Key Takeaways
- The Calcutta High Court has mandated the publication of a list of 'untainted' non-teaching staff.
- Justice Amrita Sinha emphasized the need for transparency in recruitment.
- The Supreme Court ruling supports age relaxation for eligible staff.
- Allegations of corruption within the 2016 panel have been raised.
- West Bengal has significant vacancies for non-teaching roles.
Kolkata, Dec 3 (NationPress) The Calcutta High Court mandated the West Bengal School Service Commission (WBSSC) on Wednesday to release the list of ‘untainted’ non-teaching personnel within the Group-C and Group-D categories from its 2016 panel, a panel that was entirely annulled following a Supreme Court ruling in April of this year.
Justice Amrita Sinha, presiding over a single-judge bench, instructed the WBSSC to ensure the list is published by Thursday. She emphasized that making the list public is crucial to allow these individuals the opportunity to engage in the upcoming recruitment process and to benefit from necessary age relaxations.
The apex court's division bench had also stated that age relaxations should be afforded to the ‘untainted’ non-teaching staff who lost their jobs due to the cancellation of the entire panel.
Justice Sinha's directives followed a petition alleging severe irregularities in how the WBSSC categorized ‘untainted’ versus ‘tainted’ non-teaching staff within the 2016 panel. Petitioners claimed that numerous ‘tainted’ members, who have been proven to have secured positions through corrupt means, managed to appear on the ‘untainted’ list.
Conversely, the petitioners asserted that several individuals classified as ‘untainted’ were unjustly excluded from the same list.
According to the Supreme Court’s earlier ruling this year, the ‘untainted’ non-teaching staff from the 2016 panel will be eligible for participation in the new recruitment process, while those identified as ‘tainted’ will not.
In total, there are 2,989 vacancies for non-teaching staff in the Group-C category and 5,488 in the Group-D category within West Bengal's state-run schools.
Point of View
This ruling by the Calcutta High Court underscores the importance of transparency and integrity within the recruitment processes of educational institutions. Ensuring that only deserving candidates are selected, free from corruption, aligns with the broader goals of justice and fairness in employment across the country.
NationPress
04/12/2025
Frequently Asked Questions
What did the Calcutta High Court order regarding the WBSSC?
The Calcutta High Court ordered the WBSSC to publish the list of 'untainted' non-teaching staff from its 2016 panel, allowing them to participate in fresh recruitment.
What are the implications of this order?
The order ensures that 'untainted' staff can benefit from necessary age relaxations and participate in upcoming recruitment processes.
Why was the 2016 panel cancelled?
The panel was annulled following a Supreme Court ruling that highlighted irregularities in the recruitment process.
How many vacancies are there for non-teaching staff?
There are 2,989 vacancies in the Group-C category and 5,488 in the Group-D category for non-teaching staff in West Bengal.
What does 'untainted' mean in this context?
'Untainted' refers to non-teaching staff who have not been involved in corrupt practices to secure their positions.
