Did the Calcutta HC reverse the order cancelling the appointment of 32,000 primary teachers?

Click to start listening
Did the Calcutta HC reverse the order cancelling the appointment of 32,000 primary teachers?

Synopsis

In a significant judicial ruling, the Calcutta High Court's division bench has reinstated the appointments of 32,000 primary teachers, previously annulled by a single-judge bench. This decision highlights the court's recognition of the unjust impact on innocent educators and their families amidst acknowledged recruitment irregularities.

Key Takeaways

  • The Calcutta High Court's division bench provided relief to 32,000 primary teachers.
  • The cancellation of the appointments was overturned despite acknowledged recruitment irregularities.
  • The decision emphasized the importance of not penalizing innocent candidates.
  • The ruling reflects the judiciary's role in balancing justice and compassion.
  • Future details will be available on the Calcutta High Court's official website.

Kolkata, Dec 3 (NationPress) On Wednesday, the division bench of the Calcutta High Court overturned the decision made by a single-judge bench that had nullified the appointment of 32,000 primary teachers in state-run educational institutions.

This ruling has provided significant relief to the West Bengal government. The six-month-long dispute concluded at the division bench, which included Justice Tapabrata Chakraborty and Justice Ritabrata Kumar Mitra, on November 12. Although the division bench reserved judgment on that date, the final decision was announced on Wednesday afternoon.

Upon dismissing the single-judge bench's earlier ruling, the division bench noted that while irregularities in the recruitment process were acknowledged, it was unjust to cancel the jobs of so many primary teachers who had been serving for years.

The judges emphasized that the innocent candidates, who had no involvement in the identified irregularities, should not face repercussions. They also remarked that revoking the positions of 32,000 primary teachers would adversely affect their families.

The specifics of the division bench's observations, which informed the decision to dismiss the single-judge bench's order, will be available once the official copy is uploaded on the Calcutta High Court website.

The proceedings at the division bench began on April 28.

To summarize, on May 12, 2023, a single-judge bench, presided over by the then judge of the Calcutta High Court and now BJP Lok Sabha member, Abhijit Gangopadhyay, ordered the termination of 32,000 primary teacher appointments in the state.

This order was issued in response to petitions from candidates claiming that many individuals secured appointments through unjust means, despite ranking significantly lower in the recruitment examinations.

The state government contested this ruling at the division bench, which was led by Justice Soumen Sen and Justice Smita Das De. However, after Justice Sen recused himself from the case, it was reassigned to the bench of Justice Chakraborty and Justice Mitra.

In 2014, based on the Teachers' Eligibility Test (TET) conducted by the West Bengal Board of Primary Education (WBBPE), a total of 42,500 primary teachers were hired. Some candidates participating in the TET filed a lawsuit in the Calcutta High Court, alleging widespread irregularities in the recruitment process, including monetary exchanges for job placements.

Following an extensive hearing, the single-judge bench, led by Justice Gangopadhyay, canceled the appointments of 32,000 primary teachers on May 12, 2023.

Ultimately, the ruling from the division bench of Justice Chakraborty and Justice Mitra, dismissing the single-judge bench's decision, offered much-needed relief to the 32,000 primary teachers.

Point of View

The ruling by the Calcutta High Court demonstrates a commitment to uphold justice while recognizing the plight of innocent individuals caught in administrative irregularities. This decision reflects the judiciary's role in balancing accountability with compassion, ensuring that the lives of countless families are not unjustly disrupted.
NationPress
03/12/2025

Frequently Asked Questions

What was the decision made by the Calcutta High Court?
The Calcutta High Court's division bench dismissed the previous order that canceled the appointments of 32,000 primary teachers, allowing them to retain their jobs.
Why were the appointments of these teachers initially canceled?
The appointments were canceled due to allegations of irregularities in the recruitment process, where some candidates were said to have secured jobs through unfair means.
What was the impact of the court's ruling?
The ruling provided significant relief to the teachers and their families, preventing potential job losses after years of service.
Who presided over the division bench that made the ruling?
The division bench was led by Justice Tapabrata Chakraborty and Justice Ritabrata Kumar Mitra.
When did the hearing for this case begin?
The hearing at the division bench began on April 28.
Nation Press