Should Candidates Be Disqualified for Unauthorized Digital Signature Use?
Synopsis
Key Takeaways
- Milind Deora has filed an objection with the SEC regarding unauthorized digital signatures.
- Forms A and B are essential for candidate nominations.
- The integrity of the electoral process is under scrutiny.
- Digital signatures may lead to disqualification of candidates.
- Political alliances in Maharashtra are facing challenges during elections.
Mumbai, Dec 31 (NationPress) Shiv Sena MP Milind Deora formally addressed the State Election Commission (SEC) on Wednesday, seeking the disqualification of multiple candidates due to purported unauthorized digital signature usage on essential nomination papers.
In his correspondence to the SEC, Deora pointed out significant procedural irregularities concerning the issuance and authentication of Form A and Form B.
"These documents are vital for elections. Form A empowers party officials to nominate candidates, while Form B identifies the officially sanctioned candidate entitled to use the party's reserved symbol," he stated.
Deora argued that numerous political entities have been submitting these forms with digital or computerized signatures, a procedure he claims contradicts the SEC's established regulations.
He emphasized that current guidelines mandate these forms to bear the physical signatures of authorized party representatives.
"The application of digital signatures undermines the sanctity, transparency, and integrity of the electoral process," Deora expressed in his appeal.
He contended that candidates using digitally signed forms have effectively filed nominations without proper authorization.
As a result, Deora has requested the SEC to annul all Forms A and B filed through digital or computerized signatures, reject those nominations, and disqualify any candidates who submitted such forms. He also called for urgent clarifications to Returning Officers to ensure strict compliance with physical signature requirements.
This objection arises during a critical election period for Maharashtra's local governing bodies, including municipal corporations and councils.
Deora cautioned that acceptance of digital signatures could create a dangerous precedent and provide an unlawful advantage to parties circumventing traditional verification methods. The State Election Commission has not yet responded officially to Deora's request.
In the meantime, the ruling Mahayuti alliance has been unable to reach consensus in 24 out of 29 municipal corporations. In these regions, the constituent parties (BJP, Shinde’s Shiv Sena, and Ajit Pawar's NCP) will vie against one another.
The affected municipalities encompass Jalna, Parbhani, Latur, Amravati, Pimpri-Chinchwad, Chhatrapati Sambhajinagar, Solapur, Akola, Malegaon, Nanded, Nagpur, Sangli, Nashik, Dhule, Pune, Mumbai, Thane, Ulhasnagar, Navi Mumbai, Mira-Bhayandar, Bhiwandi, and Vasai-Virar. The BJP-NCP (Ajit Pawar) alliance is restricted to only Akola, Ahilyanagar, and Panvel.
Conversely, the BJP-Shiv Sena (Shinde) alliance exists solely in Chandrapur, Nagpur, Mumbai, Thane, Kalyan-Dombivli, and Bhiwandi.
Moreover, the Mahayuti parties will directly compete in four locations: Ichalkaranji (friendly contests), Kolhapur, Jalgaon, and Panvel.