Is Charanjit Channi's Critique of Surgical Strikes Justified?

Click to start listening
Is Charanjit Channi's Critique of Surgical Strikes Justified?

Synopsis

In a controversial statement, former Punjab CM Charanjit Channi has raised questions about the validity of the 2019 surgical strikes, igniting a political firestorm. This article explores the reactions from various political leaders and the implications for national unity and security.

Key Takeaways

  • Channi's remarks question the legitimacy of surgical strikes.
  • Immediate backlash from BJP leaders highlights the political divide.
  • The need for national unity amidst rising tensions is emphasized.
  • Political leaders are urged to support the armed forces unequivocally.
  • The ongoing Kashmir situation remains a sensitive topic.

New Delhi, 3 May (NationPress) The remarks made by Congress MP and former Punjab Chief Minister Charanjit Singh Channi have sparked a significant political controversy, as he questioned the authenticity of the 2019 surgical strikes conducted by the Indian military in response to the devastating Pulwama terror attack.

"No one witnessed where the surgical strike took place, how many casualties there were, or the specific location in Pakistan. Nothing occurred. I have consistently called for evidence," Channi stated, casting doubt on the widely acknowledged military operation that followed the death of 40 CRPF personnel in Pulwama.

His comments provoked a swift reaction from BJP leaders, who accused Channi and the Congress party of undermining the armed forces and damaging the morale of the nation.

In an interview with IANS, political figures across the spectrum condemned the former Punjab CM for allegedly "disrespecting" the Indian Army and jeopardizing the unity and integrity of the country.

BJP National General Secretary Tarun Chugh labeled Channi's statements as an insult to both the Army and the nation, claiming that the Congress was aligning itself with a narrative favorable to Pakistan.

"This statement undermines the unity, integrity, and divine essence of our country," Chugh remarked.

Rajasthan Minister Jogaram Patel criticized Channi for demanding "proof of universally accepted facts," accusing the Congress of supporting reprehensible activities.

Former Jammu Deputy Chief Minister Kavinder Gupta stated, "In times of crisis, the rhetoric of Pakistan and Congress aligns. This is no surprise from them."

BJP spokesperson RP Singh asserted that Channi's comments not only reflected his views but also hinted at discussions within the Congress Working Committee.

"Kharge and Rahul Gandhi need to clarify whether the Congress Working Committee resembles a gathering in Pakistan," he added.

BJP leaders Syed Shahnawaz Hussain and Bihar Minister Santosh Kumar Singh also criticized the Congress, accusing it of continually undermining the Army and national morale.

Shiv Sena's Krishna Hegde remarked, "During this critical juncture, Congress is mimicking Pakistan's position. The public will not forgive them."

JD-U spokesperson Rajeev Ranjan described Channi's remarks as evidence of "intellectual bankruptcy" and noted his history of making controversial statements. His colleague Neeraj Kumar suggested that the populace had already executed a "political surgical strike" against Congress in both 2019 and 2024.

Delhi Assembly Deputy Speaker Mohan Singh Bisht harshly criticized Channi, saying, "He has completely lost his senses… If he had lost someone in his family due to such attacks, he might comprehend the pain."

Conversely, Congress leaders distanced themselves from Channi's comments.

Senior leader Harish Rawat stated, "This is not the moment to revisit past issues. Our leadership is steadfast in supporting national unity and any action against terrorism."

He admitted that "sometimes, past realities unintentionally emerge," but reaffirmed that the party officially backs decisive action against terrorism and Pakistan.

Congress MP Adhir Ranjan Chowdhury mentioned that Channi expressed a personal viewpoint, saying, "As a former Chief Minister, he should have known better. However, the ongoing situation in Kashmir, where 26 Hindu tourists were killed, indicates that the Kashmir issue remains unresolved. There was a lack of police presence and intelligence."

Channi's contentious remarks came shortly after the Pahalgam terror attack that resulted in the deaths of over two dozen Hindu tourists, allegedly at the hands of the Pakistan-based terror group Lashkar-e-Taiba's offshoot, The Resistance Front.

Point of View

It is imperative to acknowledge the significant implications of Channi's statements on national sentiment and the armed forces. Regardless of political affiliations, the security and unity of the nation must remain paramount. Disparaging the military's actions, especially in the context of recent terror attacks, can have detrimental effects on public morale and national cohesion.
NationPress
18/06/2025

Frequently Asked Questions

What did Charanjit Channi say about the surgical strikes?
Charanjit Channi questioned the authenticity of the 2019 surgical strikes and demanded proof of their occurrence.
How did BJP leaders react to Channi's comments?
BJP leaders condemned Channi, accusing him of disrespecting the armed forces and undermining national morale.
What is the significance of the 2019 surgical strikes?
The 2019 surgical strikes were a military response to the Pulwama terror attack, aimed at neutralizing terror threats from Pakistan.
What are the broader implications of Channi's remarks?
Channi's remarks have sparked a debate on national unity, security, and the role of political leaders in supporting the armed forces.
What actions are Congress leaders taking in response?
Congress leaders are distancing themselves from Channi's comments, emphasizing their support for national unity and action against terrorism.